SynthesisMedicine2020
Common gene signatures and key pathways in hypopharyngeal and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatic analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Advances of Treatments, Therapeutic Targets, Biomarkers, Novel Drugs, and Machine Learning for Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Scoping Review.Clinical medicine & research · 2025Article
- Evaluating Potential Therapeutic Targets and Drug Repurposing Based on the Esophageal Cancer Subtypes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Therapeutic implications of endoplasmic reticulum stress gene CCL3 in cervical squamous cell carcinoma.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Article
- Screening of co-expressed genes in hypopharyngeal carcinoma with esophageal carcinoma based on RNA sequencing and Clinical Research.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Identification of potential pseudogenes for predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Approach to Localized Squamous Cell Cancer of the Esophagus.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022Review
- Article
- Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: Mechanisms of Tumor Progression and Novel Therapeutic Targets.Cancers · 2022Review
- Case Report: First-Line Immunotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma Combined With Hypopharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma Yields Sustained Survival Benefit.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypopharyngeal and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are the most common double primary tumors with poor prognosis. Intensive work has been made to illuminate the etiology, but the common carcinogenic mechanism remains unclear. Thus, we conducted the study to seek to find the common gene signatures and key functional pathways associated with oncogenesis and treatment in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC) and ESCC by bioinformatic analysis.
methodsThree independent datasets (GSE2379, GSE20347, and GSE75241) were screened out from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the overlapping differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using GEO2R online platform. Subsequently, the Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways enrichment analysis of DEGs were conducted using database for annotation, visualization and integrated discovery (DAVID). Meanwhile, the protein-protein interaction network (PPI) constructed by search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes (STRING) was visualized using Cytoscape. Afterwards, the most key module and hub genes were extracted from the PPI network using the Molecular Complex Detection plugin. Moreover, the gene expression profiling interactive analysis (GEPIA) was applied to verify the expression differences and conduct the survival analyses of hub genes. Finally, the interaction network of miRNAs and hub genes constructed by encyclopedia of RNA interactomes (ENCORI) was visualized using Cytoscape.
resultsA total of 43 DEGs were identified, comprising 25 upregulated genes and 18 downregulated genes, which were mainly involved in the extracellular matrix-receptor interaction, collagen metabolic, epidermis development, cell adhesion, and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways. Subsequently, 12 hub genes were obtained and survival analysis demonstrated SERPINE1 and SPP1 were closely related to poor prognosis of patients with HSCC and ESCC. Finally, hsa-miR-29c-3p, hsa-miR-29a-3p, and hsa-miR-29b-3p were confirmed as the top 3 interactive miRNAs that target the most hub genes according to the interaction network of miRNAs and hub genes.
conclusionThe common gene signatures and functional pathways identified in the study may contribute to understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in the carcinogenesis and progression of HSCC and ESCC, and provide potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.