ArticleMedicine2020
Trans-uretero-cystic external urethral stent for urinary diversion in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A novel approach.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric ureteral stenting: state-of-the-art review.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Double J stent combined with pyelostomy tube in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year clinical experience in a single center.BMC urology · 2023Article
- Comparison of Drainage Methods After Pyeloplasty in Children: A 14-Year Study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe present a new approach for urine drainage in pediatric patients following laparoscopic pyeloplasty, the trans-uretero-cystic external urethral stent (TEUS).
methodsWe retrospectively identified 85 children who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty from July 2015 to June 2017. The included children were assigned to group A (double-J stent) or group B (TEUS). In group A, the double-J stent was removed by a cystoscopy under anesthesia after 1 month, while in group B, the external stent was removed after 5 to 7 days. We examined the durations of operation, hospital stay and the frequency of stent-related complications including urinary leakage, stent dislocation, stent occlusion, and urinary tract infection.
resultsThe operation time was significantly longer for patients in group B than for those in group A. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding stent-related complications. In group A, 4 patients need auxiliary stent re-insertion for the management of complications, 2 developed urinary tract infection, and 2 had stent occlusion. In group B, none needed auxiliary stent re-insertion for complications and avoided re-operation.
conclusionsIn children, the outcome of external stent implantation was similar to that using double-J stent, and the use of the former approach may be beneficial for younger children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.