Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33080258›Full record

SynthesisAdvanced drug delivery reviews2020

Bioengineered elastin- and silk-biomaterials for drug and gene delivery.

Laura Chambre, Zaira Martín-Moldes, Rachael N Parker, David L Kaplan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Recombinant fibrous protein biomaterials meet skin tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura ChambreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby St, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Zaira Martín-MoldesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby St, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Rachael N ParkerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby St, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby St, Medford, MA 02155, USA. Electronic address: david.kaplan@tufts.edu.
Tufts University · US

Funding

Tissue Engineering Resource Center: TTDP41EB027062 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic · 2019 to 2026
$12.6M
Models to Predict Protein Biomaterial PerformanceU01EB014976 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI BUEHLER, MARKUS J., KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2012 to 2020
$5.2M
Focal Sustained Release Chemotherapy-Loaded Biomaterials at Tumor SitesR01NS094218 · NINDS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI CHIU, BILL, KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027062NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB014976NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in medical science have led to diverse new therapeutic modalities, as well as enhanced understanding of the progression of various disease states. These findings facilitate the design and development of more customized and exquisite drug delivery systems that aim to improve therapeutic indices of drugs to treat a variety of conditions. Synthetic polymer-based drug carriers have often been the focus of such research. However, these structures suffer from challenges with heterogeneity of the starting material, limited chemical features, complex functionalization methods, and in some cases a lack of biocompatibility. Consequently, protein-based polymers have garnered much attention in recent years due to their monodisperse features, ease of production and functionalization, and biocompatibility. Genetic engineering techniques enable the advancement of protein-based drug delivery systems with finely tuned physicochemical properties, and thus an expanded level of customization unavailable with synthetic polymers. Of these genetically engineered proteins, elastin-like proteins (ELP), silk-like proteins (SLP), and silk-elastin-like proteins (SELP) provide a unique set of alternatives for designing drug delivery systems due to their inherent chemical and physical properties and ease of engineering afforded by recombinant DNA technologies. In this review we examine the advantages of genetically engineered drug delivery systems with emphasis on ELP and SLP constructions. Methods for fabrication and relevant biomedical applications will also be discussed.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsDrug Delivery SystemsElastinGene Transfer TechniquesHumansHydrogelsNanoparticlesParticle SizeProtein EngineeringRecombinant ProteinsSilkBiocompatible MaterialsElastinHydrogelsRecombinant ProteinsSilkDrug deliveryElastin-like proteinsGene deliveryGenetic engineeringRecombinant proteinSilk-like proteins

Identifiers

PMID33080258
PMCPMC7736173
OpenAlexW3092813380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.