Trial reportPloS one2020
Predicting overdose among individuals prescribed opioids using routinely collected healthcare utilization data.
Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence-based framework for identifying opioid use disorder in administrative data: A systematic review and methodological development study.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring trends and autonomy levels of adaptive business intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Predictive Models to Assess Risk of Persistent Opioid Use, Opioid Use Disorder, and Overdose.Journal of addiction medicinePooled it
- Predicting and differentiating opioid and non-opioid drug poisonings using health records data.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2026Article
- A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Design and development of a machine-learning-driven opioid overdose risk prediction tool integrated in electronic health records in primary care settings.Bioelectronic medicine · 2024Article
- Outcome class imbalance and rare events: An underappreciated complication for overdose risk prediction modeling.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- Applying Machine Learning in Distributed Data Networks for Pharmacoepidemiologic and Pharmacovigilance Studies: Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations.Drug safety · 2022Review
- Identifying Predictors of Opioid Overdose Death at a Neighborhood Level With Machine Learning.American journal of epidemiology · 2022Article
- Assessing opioid overdose risk: a review of clinical prediction models utilizing patient-level data.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith increasing rates of opioid overdoses in the US, a surveillance tool to identify high-risk patients may help facilitate early intervention.
objectiveTo develop an algorithm to predict overdose using routinely-collected healthcare databases.
methodsWithin a US commercial claims database (2011-2015), patients with ≥1 opioid prescription were identified. Patients were randomly allocated into the training (50%), validation (25%), or test set (25%). For each month of follow-up, pooled logistic regression was used to predict the odds of incident overdose in the next month based on patient history from the preceding 3-6 months (time-updated), using elastic net for variable selection. As secondary analyses, we explored whether using simpler models (few predictors, baseline only) or different analytic methods (random forest, traditional regression) influenced performance.
resultsWe identified 5,293,880 individuals prescribed opioids; 2,682 patients (0.05%) had an overdose during follow-up (mean: 17.1 months). On average, patients who overdosed were younger and had more diagnoses and prescriptions. The elastic net model achieved good performance (c-statistic 0.887, 95% CI 0.872-0.902; sensitivity 80.2, specificity 80.1, PPV 0.21, NPV 99.9 at optimal cutpoint). It outperformed simpler models based on few predictors (c-statistic 0.825, 95% CI 0.808-0.843) and baseline predictors only (c-statistic 0.806, 95% CI 0.787-0.26). Different analytic techniques did not substantially influence performance. In the final algorithm based on elastic net, the strongest predictors were age 18-25 years (OR: 2.21), prior suicide attempt (OR: 3.68), opioid dependence (OR: 3.14).
conclusionsWe demonstrate that sophisticated algorithms using healthcare databases can be predictive of overdose, creating opportunities for active monitoring and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.