Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33079965›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

The effect of etidronate on choroidal neovascular activity in patients with pseudoxanthoma elasticum.

Sara Risseeuw, Redmer van Leeuwen, Saskia M Imhof, Pim A de Jong, Willem P Th M Mali, Wilko Spiering, Jeannette Ossewaarde-van Norel

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Weighing the Evidence for the Roles of Plasma Versus Local Pyrophosphate in Ectopic Calcification Disorders.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara RisseeuwDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2970-797X
Redmer van LeeuwenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Saskia M ImhofDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pim A de JongDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem P Th M MaliDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wilko SpieringDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeannette Ossewaarde-van NorelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the effect of the bisphosphonate etidronate on choroidal neovascular (CNV) activity in patients with pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE).

methodsThis is an ancillary study in a single center, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial (RCT) in which 74 patients with PXE were assigned to either one-year etidronate or placebo treatment. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging and color fundus photography were performed every three months for one year and were systematically assessed on signs of CNV activity.

resultsIn the etidronate group, 11 (30%) of the patients had CNV activity at baseline, compared to 25 (67%) of the patients in the placebo group (P = 0.005). The proportion of eyes with CNV activity during the study ranged from 18-33% in the etidronate group and 42-56% in the placebo group and no significant difference in improvement or worsening of CNV activity was found (P = 0.168). Using a generalized mixed model for repeated measures, there was a protective effect of etidronate in crude analysis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98) that disappeared when adjusting for baseline CNV activity (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84-1.13).

conclusionIn this post-hoc RCT analysis we did not observe a protecting or deteriorating effect of etidronate on CNV activity in patients with PXE after adjustment for baseline CNV.

Indexed as

AgedChoroidal NeovascularizationDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleEtidronic AcidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPseudoxanthoma ElasticumTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeEtidronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID33079965
PMCPMC7575070
OpenAlexW3093550060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.