Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33079263›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2020

Intraventricular synchronism assessment by gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Does cardiomyopathy type influence results?

Amalia Peix, Kenia Padrón, Lázaro O Cabrera, Osmín Castañeda, Danet Milán, Jesús Castro, Roylan Falcón, Frank Martínez, Lydia Rodríguez, Jesús Sánchez and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Predictive values of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony for CRT response in heart failure patients with different pathophysiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amalia PeixNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba. atpeix@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5805-1810
Kenia PadrónNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Lázaro O CabreraNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Osmín CastañedaNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Danet MilánNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Jesús CastroNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Roylan FalcónNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Frank MartínezNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Lydia RodríguezNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Jesús SánchezNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Erick MenaNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Regla CarrilloNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Yoel FernándezNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Ricardo EscaranoNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 #702, Vedado, 10 400, La Habana, Cuba.
Diana PáezNuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Maurizio DondiNuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
University of Havana · CUInternational Atomic Energy Agency · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the evolution post-cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) cardiomyopathy (CM) patients compared to other types of CM, according to clinical and functional variables, by using gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

methodsNinety-three patients (60 ± 11 years, 28% women) referred for pre-CRT assessment were studied and divided into three groups: 1 (non-ischemic CM with LVNC, 11 patients), 2 (ischemic CM, 28 patients), and 3 (non-ischemic CM, 53 patients). All were studied by a

resultsNo differences in sex, atherosclerotic risk factors other than smoking habit, and MLHFQ results were found among groups. LVNC CM patients were younger, with greater QRS width and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline, but the differences were not significant. No significant differences were found at baseline regarding ventricular function, although end-systolic volume was slightly higher in LVNC CM patients. Mean SRS was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in ischemic patients (14.9) versus non-ischemic ones (8.7 in group 1 and 9 in group 2). At baseline, LVNC CM patients were significantly more dyssynchronous: Their phase standard deviation (PSD) was higher (89.5° ± 14.2°) versus groups 2 (65.2° ± 23.3°) and 3 (69.7° ± 21.7°), p = 0.007. Although the quality of life significantly improved in all groups, non-ischemic patients (with or without LVNC) showed a higher LVEF increase and volumes reduction at 6 months post-CRT. Dyssynchrony reduced post-CRT in all groups. Nevertheless, those more dyssynchronous at baseline (LVNC CM) exhibited the most significant intraventricular synchronism improvement: PSD was reduced from 89.5° ± 14.2° at baseline to 63.7° ± 20.5° post-CRT (p = 0.028). Six months post-CRT, 89% of patients were responders: 11 (100%) of those with LVNC CM, 25 (86%) of those with ischemic CM, and 47 (89%) of patients with non-ischemic CM. No patient with LVNC CM had adverse events during the follow-up.

conclusionCRT contributes to a marked improvement in non-ischemic CM patients with non-compaction myocardium. Phase analysis in gated-SPECT MPI is a valuable tool to assess the response to CRT.

Indexed as

Cardiac resynchronization therapyCardiomyopathiesGated-SPECTIntraventricular dyssynchronyNon-compaction myocardiumPhase analysis

Identifiers

PMID33079263
PMCPMC7575672
OpenAlexW3093402597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.