ArticleArchives of toxicology2020
A locust embryo as predictive developmental neurotoxicity testing system for pioneer axon pathway formation.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- CO and NO Coordinate Developmental Neuron Migration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Neurotoxicity and Developmental Neurotoxicity of Copper Sulfide Nanoparticles on a Human Neuronal In-Vitro Test System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Looking at Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing from the Perspective of an Invertebrate Embryo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Developmental Neurotoxicity of Fipronil and Rotenone on a Human Neuronal In Vitro Test System.Neurotoxicity research · 2021Article
- Cholinergic calcium responses in cultured antennal lobe neurons of the migratory locust.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exposure to environmental chemicals during in utero and early postnatal development can cause a wide range of neurological defects. Since current guidelines for identifying developmental neurotoxic chemicals depend on the use of large numbers of rodents in animal experiments, it has been proposed to design rapid and cost-efficient in vitro screening test batteries that are mainly based on mixed neuronal/glial cultures. However, cell culture tests do not assay correct wiring of neuronal circuits. The establishment of precise anatomical connectivity is a key event in the development of a functional brain. Here, we expose intact embryos of the locust (Locusta migratoria) in serum-free culture to test chemicals and visualize correct navigation of identified pioneer axons by fluorescence microscopy. We define separate toxicological endpoints for axonal elongation and navigation along a stereotyped pathway. To distinguish developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) from general toxicity, we quantify defects in axonal elongation and navigation in concentration-response curves and compare it to the biochemically determined viability of the embryo. The investigation of a panel of recognized DNT-positive and -negative test compounds supports a rather high predictability of this invertebrate embryo assay. Similar to the semaphorin-mediated guidance of neurites in mammalian cortex, correct axonal navigation of the locust pioneer axons relies on steering cues from members of this family of cell recognition molecules. Due to the evolutionary conserved mechanisms of neurite guidance, we suggest that our pioneer axon paradigm might provide mechanistically relevant information on the DNT potential of chemical agents on the processes of axon elongation, navigation, and fasciculation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.