Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33079207›Full record

ReviewExperimental brain research2020

The multiple process model of goal-directed aiming/reaching: insights on limb control from various special populations.

Digby Elliott, James Lyons, Spencer J Hayes, James J Burkitt, Steve Hansen, Lawrence E M Grierson, Nathan C Foster, James W Roberts, Simon J Bennett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The role of binocular vision in the control and development of visually guided upper limb movements.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Digby ElliottDepartment of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. elliott@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-2311
James LyonsDepartment of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Spencer J HayesDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, University College London, London, UK.
James J BurkittOntario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
Steve HansenSchool of Physical and Health Education, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada.
Lawrence E M GriersonDepartment of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Nathan C FosterCognition, Motion and Neuroscience Unit, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.
James W RobertsBrain and Behaviour Laboratory, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Simon J BennettBrain and Behaviour Laboratory, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 754490Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 386762Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Foundation of Canada 386762-2010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several years ago, our research group forwarded a model of goal-directed reaching and aiming that describes the processes involved in the optimization of speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure Elliott et al. (Psychol Bull 136:1023-1044, 2010). One of the main features of the model is the distinction between early impulse control, which is based on a comparison of expected to perceived sensory consequences, and late limb-target control that involves a spatial comparison of limb and target position. Our model also emphasizes the importance of strategic behaviors that limit the opportunity for worst-case or inefficient outcomes. In the 2010 paper, we included a section on how our model can be used to understand atypical aiming/reaching movements in a number of special populations. In light of a recent empirical and theoretical update of our model Elliott et al. (Neurosci Biobehav Rev 72:95-110, 2017), here we consider contemporary motor control work involving typical aging, Down syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, and tetraplegia with tendon-transfer surgery. We outline how atypical limb control can be viewed within the context of the multiple-process model of goal-directed reaching and aiming, and discuss the underlying perceptual-motor impairment that results in the adaptive solution developed by the specific group.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderGoalsExtremitiesHumansMovementPsychomotor PerformanceAgingAutismDown syndromeLimb controlSpeed-accuracyTetraplegia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.