ArticleNanoscale2020
The dance of the nanobubbles: detecting acoustic backscatter from sub-micron bubbles using ultra-high frequency acoustic microscopy.
Article in Nanoscale, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Formulation of Agarose Gels Containing Chitosan-Oleic Acid Complex Particles and Their Physical and In Vitro Digestion Properties.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Skin-Interfaced Therapeutic Patches for Wound Fluid Management and Transdermal Drug Delivery.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- D‑Blur: A Deep Learning Approach for Mapping Subdiffraction Diffusion with Motion-Blurred Images.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2025Article
- Protein Nanocages as Building Blocks for Conjugated Supramolecular Materials Displaying Multitasking Properties.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Assessing Therapeutic Nanoparticle Accumulation in Tumors Using Nanobubble-Based Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Decorrelation Time Mapping as an Analysis Tool for Nanobubble-Based Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Radiation combined with ultrasound and microbubbles: A potential novel strategy for cancer treatment.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Review
- Detection of clot formation & lysisPhotoacoustics · 2023Article
- The Influence of Nanobubble Size and Stability on Ultrasound Enhanced Drug Delivery.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2022Article
- Nanobubble Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: A Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanobubbles have gained attention for their use as highly stable ultrasound (US) contrast agents, but assessment of individual nanobubble size remains a challenge. Current sizing techniques require either extensive sample preparation or depend on assumed values of nanobubble density that are not well characterized. An US based approach would be desirable; however, probing individual nanobubbles using US transducers at clinical frequencies is not feasible due to the comparatively long acoustic wavelengths employed. Here we present a technique which can be used to estimate nano- or microbubble size by virtue of the amount of motion detected in an M-Mode image acquired using an acoustic microscope equipped with a 200 MHz transducer. A sample of a bubble-containing solution is incorporated into a phantom composed of molten agarose. The solidified agarose gel contains pores with well-defined sizes dictated by the agarose concentration. Bubbles in the gel matrix that are smaller in diameter than the gel pore size are capable of undergoing stochastic motion which manifests as intensity fluctuations in M-Mode images. Conversely, bubbles which are larger than the agarose pores become trapped and produce static M-Mode intensity patterns. In this study, agarose gels with concentrations ranging from 0.25% to 1.25% (mean pore sizes ranging from 2.68 μm to 0.34 μm) were loaded with either nanobubbles (mean diameter 0.326 μm) or microbubbles (mean diameter 2.71 μm) and imaged at 200 MHz. In the nanobubble loaded gels, M-Mode fluctuations were clearly visible up to a gel concentration of 1% (pore size of 0.39 μm). In contrast, the microbubble loaded gels exhibited minimal M-Mode fluctuation even at agarose concentrations of 0.25% (2.68 μm pore size). Autocorrelation curves generated from the M-Mode data demonstrated a clear trend of curve flattening (loss of motion) when the pore size was comparable to mean bubble diameter, indicating that individual bubbles trapped in the agarose pores are the main source of acoustic backscatter. In the future, decay parameters extracted from the autocorrelation curves could potentially be used as indicators of mean bubble diameter for bubble populations of unknown size.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.