Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33079108›Full record

ArticleNanoscale2020

The dance of the nanobubbles: detecting acoustic backscatter from sub-micron bubbles using ultra-high frequency acoustic microscopy.

Michael J Moore, Filip Bodera, Christopher Hernandez, Niloufar Shirazi, Eric Abenojar, Agata A Exner, Michael C Kolios

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Influence of Nanobubble Size and Stability on Ultrasound Enhanced Drug Delivery.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2022
    Article
  11. Nanobubble Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: A Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael J MooreDepartment of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada. mkolios@ryerson.ca.
Filip Bodera
Christopher Hernandez
Niloufar Shirazi
Eric Abenojar
Agata A Exner
Michael C Kolios

Funding

Improved Detection of Prostate Cancer with Nanoparticle-based Ultrasound Contrast Agents Targeted to PSMAR01EB025741 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI James Peter Basilion, Agata A Exner · 2018 to 2026
$4.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanobubbles have gained attention for their use as highly stable ultrasound (US) contrast agents, but assessment of individual nanobubble size remains a challenge. Current sizing techniques require either extensive sample preparation or depend on assumed values of nanobubble density that are not well characterized. An US based approach would be desirable; however, probing individual nanobubbles using US transducers at clinical frequencies is not feasible due to the comparatively long acoustic wavelengths employed. Here we present a technique which can be used to estimate nano- or microbubble size by virtue of the amount of motion detected in an M-Mode image acquired using an acoustic microscope equipped with a 200 MHz transducer. A sample of a bubble-containing solution is incorporated into a phantom composed of molten agarose. The solidified agarose gel contains pores with well-defined sizes dictated by the agarose concentration. Bubbles in the gel matrix that are smaller in diameter than the gel pore size are capable of undergoing stochastic motion which manifests as intensity fluctuations in M-Mode images. Conversely, bubbles which are larger than the agarose pores become trapped and produce static M-Mode intensity patterns. In this study, agarose gels with concentrations ranging from 0.25% to 1.25% (mean pore sizes ranging from 2.68 μm to 0.34 μm) were loaded with either nanobubbles (mean diameter 0.326 μm) or microbubbles (mean diameter 2.71 μm) and imaged at 200 MHz. In the nanobubble loaded gels, M-Mode fluctuations were clearly visible up to a gel concentration of 1% (pore size of 0.39 μm). In contrast, the microbubble loaded gels exhibited minimal M-Mode fluctuation even at agarose concentrations of 0.25% (2.68 μm pore size). Autocorrelation curves generated from the M-Mode data demonstrated a clear trend of curve flattening (loss of motion) when the pore size was comparable to mean bubble diameter, indicating that individual bubbles trapped in the agarose pores are the main source of acoustic backscatter. In the future, decay parameters extracted from the autocorrelation curves could potentially be used as indicators of mean bubble diameter for bubble populations of unknown size.

Identifiers

PMID33079108
PMCPMC7646462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.