Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078910›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2021

Estimated radiation doses to ovarian and uterine organs in breast cancer irradiation using radio-photoluminescent glass dosimeters (RPLDs).

Puntiwa Oonsiri, Chulee Vannavijit, Mananchaya Wimolnoch, Sivalee Suriyapee, Kitwadee Saksornchai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Puntiwa OonsiriRadiation Oncology Division, Radiology Department, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0226-3723
Chulee VannavijitRadiation Oncology Division, Radiology Department, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7544-8243
Mananchaya WimolnochRadiation Oncology Division, Radiology Department, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4340-5388
Sivalee SuriyapeeRadiation Oncology Division, Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-4620
Kitwadee SaksornchaiRadiation Oncology Division, Radiology Department, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-8661
Thai Red Cross Society · THChulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe well-being of breast cancer patients is essential, especially fertility in patients of reproductive age. The objective of this study was to estimate the radiation doses to the ovaries and uterus for different treatment techniques of breast cancer irradiation using radio-photoluminescent glass dosimeters (RPLDs).

methodsA Farmer-type ionisation chamber (IBA FC-65G) and RPLDs were used to measure in- and out-of-field radiation doses in a solid water phantom. The field sizes were set to 10 × 10 cm

resultsThe percentage ratio of out of field to in field was affected by distance from the central axis to the point of measurement, in addition to the field sizes associated with collimator scatter. Advanced techniques such as IMRT and VMAT produced higher doses to the ovaries and uterus. The estimated results of the worst-case scenario for the ipsilateral ovary, contralateral ovary and uterus were 0.84% (42 cGy), 0.62% (31 cGy) and 0.76% (38 cGy), respectively, for a 5000 cGy prescription dose.

conclusionThe lowest to highest out-of-field radiation doses to the ovarian and uterine organs from breast irradiation were the two tangential field techniques, VMAT and IMRT. These advanced techniques yielded higher radiation leakage, which potentially contributed to the out-of-field radiation dose.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedFemaleHumansOvaryRadiation DosageRadiation DosimetersRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedLeft-side breast irradiationout-of-field radiationovarian doseradio-photoluminescent glass dosimeters (RPLDs)

Identifiers

PMID33078910
PMCPMC8168059
OpenAlexW3092756226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.