Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078849›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2021

Role of diversification rates and evolutionary history as a driver of plant naturalization success.

Bernd Lenzner, Susana Magallón, Wayne Dawson, Holger Kreft, Christian König, Jan Pergl, Petr Pyšek, Patrick Weigelt, Mark van Kleunen, Marten Winter and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Bernd LenznerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 13, Vienna, 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2616-3479
Susana MagallónInstituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6838-7497
Wayne DawsonDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3402-0774
Holger KreftBiodiversity, Macroecology and Biogeography, University of Goettingen, Büsgenweg 1, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4471-8236
Christian KönigBiodiversity, Macroecology and Biogeography, University of Goettingen, Büsgenweg 1, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0585-5983
Jan PerglInstitute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, CZ-252 43, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0045-1974
Petr PyšekInstitute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, CZ-252 43, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8500-442X
Patrick WeigeltBiodiversity, Macroecology and Biogeography, University of Goettingen, Büsgenweg 1, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2485-3708
Mark van KleunenEcology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, Konstanz, 78457, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2861-3701
Marten WinterGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9593-7300
Stefan DullingerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 13, Vienna, 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3919-0887
Franz EsslDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 13, Vienna, 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8253-2112
University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Göttingen · DECharles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany · CZDurham University · GBGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DEUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Konstanz · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human introductions of species beyond their natural ranges and their subsequent establishment are defining features of global environmental change. However, naturalized plants are not uniformly distributed across phylogenetic lineages, with some families contributing disproportionately more to the global alien species pool than others. Additionally, lineages differ in diversification rates, and high diversification rates have been associated with characteristics that increase species naturalization success. Here, we investigate the role of diversification rates in explaining the naturalization success of angiosperm plant families. We use five global data sets that include native and alien plant species distribution, horticultural use of plants, and a time-calibrated angiosperm phylogeny. Using phylogenetic generalized linear mixed models, we analysed the effect of diversification rate, different geographical range measures, and horticultural use on the naturalization success of plant families. We show that a family's naturalization success is positively associated with its evolutionary history, native range size, and economic use. Investigating interactive effects of these predictors shows that native range size and geographic distribution additionally affect naturalization success. High diversification rates and large ranges increase naturalization success, especially of temperate families. We suggest this may result from lower ecological specialization in temperate families with large ranges, compared with tropical families with smaller ranges.

Indexed as

EcosystemPlantsGeographyIntroduced SpeciesPhylogenyalien speciesevolutiongeographic distributioninvasion successplant naturalizationrange size

Identifiers

PMID33078849
PMCPMC7894487
OpenAlexW3092720329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.