Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078728›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pharmacology

Clinical Trials Registry - India: A decadal perspective.

Mendu Vishnu Vardhana Rao, Mohua Maulik, Atul Juneja, Tulsi Adhikari, Saurabh Sharma, Jyotsna Gupta, Yashmin Panchal, Neha Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mendu Vishnu Vardhana RaoCTRI, ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Mohua MaulikCTRI, ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Atul JunejaCTRI, ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Tulsi AdhikariCTRI, ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Saurabh SharmaCTRI, ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Jyotsna GuptaCTRI, ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Yashmin PanchalCTRI, ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Neha YadavCTRI, ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present a descriptive analysis of the clinical studies registered in the Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) and deduce its impact.

methodsWe searched the CTRI databease for all registered clinical studies from July 20, 2007 to May 31, 2018. Extracted data were analyzed in three time periods i.e., Periods 1, 2, and 3 based on the major activities and milestones of the CTRI. In addition, comparative registrations of the various Primary Registries of the WHO were compiled and registration policy of Indian journals with regard to trial registration assessed.

resultsA total of 20,160 clinical studies were submitted to the CTRI in the designated study period. Of the registered 14,341 clinical studies, 10,485 (76.3%) were interventional trials which were either regulatory (n = 2004), academic non-regulatory (n = 3855), or those conducted as part of PG thesis (n = 4626) trials. Regulatory trials registration numbers varied according to the Indian regulatory scenario. PG thesis trial registrations showed a steep rise, although unlike regulatory trials, these were mostly retrospective registrations. CTRI registration numbers were comparable to that in other Primary Registries. Instructions to authors of 48% indexed Indian journals made a mention of trial registration.

conclusionsThe CTRI has a strong global presence and has enhanced the transparency of regulatory trials as well as academic research particularly thesis-based work. The latter is expected to help improve standard of research and prevent repetitive research. Additional support from Indian journal editors by strict implementation of prospective registration is crucial for increasing compliance by researchers.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicRegistriesHumansIndiaClinical trialsClinical Trials Registry – Indiaprimary registry CTRI

Identifiers

PMID33078728
PMCPMC7722906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.