ArticleSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
Time trends of causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and endoscopic findings.
Article in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Independent predictors of ICU admission, mortality, and intervention requirements in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Trends in upper gastrointestinal bleeding management.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Trends in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Children: The Impact ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Arterial Embolization after Failed Endoscopic Intervention for Acute Non-Variceal Bleeding Associated with Benign Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023Article
- Acute Upper Non-variceal and Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Review
- Patterns and Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Audit of a High-volume Center from Karachi, Pakistan.Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterologyArticle
- Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy: Clinical Patterns and Prognosis from Two Tertiary Care Hospitals.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
- Improving outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUpper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a frequent cause for emergency endoscopy and, in a proportion, requires the application of endotherapy. We aim to evaluate the proportion of variceal and nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB), the endoscopic findings that were detected, as well as the temporal trends of endoscopic findings over a period of 13 years.
methodsThis is a retrospective study of patients who underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy with an indication of UGIB or presented with hematemesis, melena, or both, as well as those who had hematochezia, from January 2004 to December 2016 (13 years).
resultsA total of 2075 patients were included with a mean age of 56.8 years (range 18-113) and males constituted 67.9%, while 65.9% had at least one comorbidity. Symptoms on presentation included hematemesis (52.5%), melena (31.2%), both hematemesis & melena (15.1%), and hematochezia (1.2%). The majority of UGIB were from a NVUGIB source (80.5%) and a variceal source was found in 13.1%, while no endoscopic findings were found in 6.4% of cases. The most common endoscopic diagnosis was gastroduodenal erosions (23.8%), duodenal ulcers (23.5%), reflux esophagitis (16.0%), esophageal varices (12.1%), and gastric ulcers (10.8%). There was no change in the endoscopic findings over the time period of the study. A third of duodenal ulcers (33.3%) as well as 21.9% of gastric ulcers were actively bleeding at the time of endoscopy, while 3.3% of duodenal ulcers had an adherent clot.
conclusionsNVUGIB composed the majority of cases presenting with UGIB and variceal bleeding was lower than that described in prior studies, but there were no clear trends in the proportion of causes of UGIB during the study duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.