Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078604›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2020

A single center cohort of 40 severe COVID-19 patients who were treated with convalescent plasma

Aliihsan Gemici, Hülya Bilgen, Cem Erdoğan, Abdullah Kansu, Oktay Olmuşçelik, Hüseyin Saffet Beköz, Rumeysa Çakmak, Ali Mert, Ömür Gökmen Sevindik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. V.I.T.A.M. in COVID 19: A Systematic Approach to a Global Pandemic.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aliihsan GemiciDepartment of Hematology, School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-3385-8359
Hülya BilgenDepartment Transfusion and Apheresis Medicine, School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7424-8688
Cem ErdoğanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-5715-8138
Abdullah KansuDepartment of Pulmonology, School of Medicine, İstanbul MedipolUniversity, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-8902-5498
Oktay OlmuşçelikDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9815-1848
Hüseyin Saffet BeközDepartment of Hematology, School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1237-8281
Rumeysa ÇakmakDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-8930-741X
Ali MertDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-8945-2385
Ömür Gökmen SevindikDepartment of Hematology, School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-9636-4113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: A SARS-Cov2 infection which was first arised from Wuhan in December 2019 and named as COVID-19. Still there lacks either a specific treatment or a vaccine to treat COVID-19. Convalescent plasma (CP) was previously used successfully to treat SARS-CoV-1 and MERS infections. Health authority in Turkey has published a guideline to integrate this promising option in the treatment process of patients who are prone to high risk of developing severe COVID 19. Materials and Methods: Forty consecutive patients who had received CP at our center were included in the study. Demographics, COVID-19 specific parameters, biomarkers to detect the severity of COVID-19 infection and outcome variables were collected retrospectively. The correlation between outcome variables and the independent predictors of the outcome were reported. Results: Median age of the patients was 57.5 and 72.5% were male. At least one COVID-19 PCR test was confirmed to be positive in 75% of patients. Remaining 25% had a Chest-CT which was reported to be compatible with an ongoing COVID-19. All patients (100%) were classified as having severe COVID-19 infection. Over a half of the patients harbored an oxygen saturation of less than 90 despite of a continuous 5 L/min support of O2. 82.5% of the patients had a need for mechanical ventilation and 45.5% had a need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Nine out of 10 patients who have received CP outside ICU have totally recovered from COVID-19 at a median of 9 days, and a half of the patients who needed invasive mechanical ventilation were successfully free of mechanical ventilation support and managed to recover from COVID-19. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, CP is an efficient conjunct to conventional therapy against COVID-19 with a favorable safety profile.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2COVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingCOVID-19 SerotherapyFemaleHumansImmunization, PassiveMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeTurkeyConvalescent plasmaCOVID-19viral infections

Identifiers

PMID33078604
PMCPMC7775681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.