Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078599›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gynecologic oncology2020

The post-progression survival of patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian clear cell carcinoma: results from a randomized phase III study in JGOG3017/GCIG.

Eiji Kondo, Tsutomu Tabata, Nao Suzuki, Daisuke Aoki, Hideaki Yahata, Yoshio Kotera, Osamu Tokuyama, Keiichi Fujiwara, Eizo Kimura, Fumitoshi Terauchi and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Eiji KondoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mie University School of medicine, Tsu, Japan. eijikon@clin.medic.mie-u.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9773-2520
Tsutomu TabataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0243-8180
Nao SuzukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-8127
Daisuke AokiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9596-8326
Hideaki YahataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyushu University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3142-8993
Yoshio KoteraDivision of Clinical Research, Global Clinical Research Coordinating Center, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-0311
Osamu TokuyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-2726
Keiichi FujiwaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-0243
Eizo KimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kosei General Hospital, Kutchan, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-3279
Fumitoshi TerauchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9028-9810
Toshiyuki SumiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7734-4173
Aikou OkamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5079-0464
Nobuo YaegashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2521-039X
Takayuki EnomotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4538-5541
Toru SugiyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-9040
Iwate Medical University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKeio University · JPKitasato University · JPKyushu University · JPMie University · JPNiigata University · JPOsaka City General Hospital · JPOsaka City University · JPSaitama International Medical Center · JPSapporo Kosei General Hospital · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPTohoku University · JPTokyo Medical University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this study we sought to investigate the clinical factors that affect post-progression survival (PPS) in patients with recurrent or persistent clear cell carcinoma (CCC). We utilized the JGOG3017/Gynecological Cancer InterGroup data to compare paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) and irinotecan plus cisplatin (CPT-P) in the treatment of stages I to IV CCC.

methodsWe enrolled 166 patients with recurrent or persistent CCC and assessed the impact of variables, including platinum sensitivity, treatment arm, crossover chemotherapy, primary stage, residual tumor at primary surgery, performance status, ethnicity, and tumor reduction surgery at recurrence on the median of PPS in patients with recurrent or persistent CCC.

resultsA total of 77 patients received TC, and 89 patients received CPT-P. The median PPS for patients with platinum-resistant disease was 10.9 months, compared with 18.8 months for patients with platinum-sensitive disease (hazard ratio [HR]=1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.30-2.72; log-rank p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the platinum sensitivity (resistant vs. sensitivity; HR=1.60; p=0.027) and primary stage (p=0.009) were identified as independent predictors of prognosis factors for PPS in recurrent or persistent CCC.

conclusionsOur findings revealed that platinum sensitivity and primary stage are clinical factors that significantly affect PPS in patients with recurrent or persistent CCC as well as other histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer. PPS in patients with recurrent CCC should establish the basis for future clinical trials in this population.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellOvarian NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPaclitaxelCarboplatinPaclitaxelOvarian CancerPlatinumRecurrenceSurvival

Identifiers

PMID33078599
PMCPMC7593225
OpenAlexW3082056880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.