Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078595›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2020

Evaluation of the optimal sequence of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer.

Jennifer McEachron, Nancy Zhou, Christina Spencer, Lisa Shanahan, Carolyn Chatterton, Pankaj Singhal, Yi Chun Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MMP11 and MMP17 are potential biomarkers for uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma prognosis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer McEachronDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA. Jennifer.McEachron@downstate.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3605-1163
Nancy ZhouDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7017-5477
Christina SpencerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, West Islip, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5931-9716
Lisa ShanahanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, West Islip, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-9615
Carolyn ChattertonDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, West Islip, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5806-8791
Pankaj SinghalDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, West Islip, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2369-9462
Yi Chun LeeDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6826-7049
Good Samaritan University Hospital · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe optimal sequence of adjuvant chemoradiation in the treatment of advanced endometrial carcinoma (EC) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with chemoradiation in sandwich fashion (chemotherapy-radiotherapy-chemotherapy; CRC), versus those treated sequentially (chemotherapy-radiotherapy; CR) (radiotherapy-chemotherapy; RC), to determine if there is a survival advantaged associated with a particular treatment sequence.

methodsA multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with stage III and IV EC from 2000-2018 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were patients who had undergone comprehensive surgical staging/tumor debulking; followed by adjuvant chemoradiation. Differences in the frequencies of adverse events were evaluated using Pearson's χ² test. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

resultsFinal analysis included 152 patients; 36.8% (n=56) CRC, 28.9% (n=44) CR, and 34.2% (n=52) RC. Histology included 44.0% endometrioid, 47.5% serous and 8.5% clear cell tumors. There was no difference in the frequency of histology (p=0.973), stage (p=0.143), cytoreduction status (p=0.932), or treatment delays (p=0.571) between adjuvant therapy sequences. The most frequent location of disease recurrence was abdomen. The median PFS favored CRC versus CR or RC (36-months vs. 22-months and 24-months, respectively) (p=0.038), as did the median OS (48-months vs. 28-months and 34-months, respectively) (p=0.003). CRC demonstrated superiority over CR and RC sequencing in terms 3-year PFS (55% vs. 34% and 37%, respectively) and 3-year OS (71% vs. 50% and 52%, respectively).

conclusionsAdjuvant chemoradiation delivered in CRC sequence was associated with improvements in both PFS and OS compared to alternant therapy sequencing.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsAdolescentAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesChemotherapyEndometrial CarcinomaRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33078595
PMCPMC7593219
OpenAlexW3082773691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.