Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078586›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2020

Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier.

Bambi L DeLaRosa, Jeffrey S Spence, Michael A Motes, Wing To, Sven Vanneste, Michael A Kraut, John Hart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation modulates theta response during a Go-NoGo task in traumatic brain injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bambi L DeLaRosaSchool of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jeffrey S SpenceCenter for BrainHealth, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Michael A MotesCallier Center - Dallas, The University of Texas at Dallas, TX, USA.
Wing ToCallier Center - Dallas, The University of Texas at Dallas, TX, USA.
Sven VannesteCallier Center - Dallas, The University of Texas at Dallas, TX, USA.
Michael A KrautDepartment of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
John HartCallier Center - Dallas, The University of Texas at Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3919-8125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrior Go/NoGo studies have localized specific regions and EEG spectra for which traditional approaches have distinguished between Go and NoGo conditions. A more detailed characterization of the spatial distribution and timing of the synchronization of frequency bands would contribute substantially to the clarification of neural mechanisms that underlie performance of the Go/NoGo task.

methodsThe present study used a machine learning approach to learn the features that distinguish between ERSPs involved in selection and inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. A single-layer neural network classifier was used to predict task conditions for each subject to characterize ERSPs associated with Go versus NoGo trials.

resultsThe final classifier accurately identified individual task conditions at an overall rate of 92%, estimated by fivefold cross-validation. The detailed accounting of EEG time-frequency patterns localized to brain regions (i.e., thalamus, pre-SMA, orbitofrontal cortex, and superior parietal cortex) corroborates and also elaborates upon previous findings from fMRI and EEG studies, and expands the information about EEG power changes in multiple frequency bands (i.e., primarily theta power increase, alpha decreases, and beta increases and decreases) within these regions underlying the selection and inhibition processes engaged in the Go and NoGo trials.

conclusionThis time-frequency-based classifier extends previous spatiotemporal findings and provides information about neural mechanisms underlying selection and inhibition processes engaged in Go and NoGo trials, respectively. This neural network classifier can be used to assess time-frequency patterns from an individual subject and thus may offer insight into therapeutic uses of neuromodulation in neural dysfunction.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyInhibition, PsychologicalBrainBrain MappingEvoked PotentialsMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingReaction TimeEEGGo/NoGomachine learningtime frequency

Identifiers

PMID33078586
PMCPMC7749513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.