ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2020
Adjustment of sex allocation to co-foundress number and kinship under local mate competition: An inclusive-fitness analysis.
Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Towards a universal understanding of sex ratio in termites.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Density-dependent dispersal reduces conflict over the sex ratio.Biology letters · 2024Article
- Individual- and group-level sex ratios under local mate competition: consequences of infanticide and reproductive dominance.Evolution letters · 2023Article
- Pollinating fig wasps' simple solutions to complex sex ratio problems: a review.Frontiers in zoology · 2022Review
- Cooperative interactions among females can lead to even more extraordinary sex ratios.Evolution letters · 2021Article
- A solution to a sex ratio puzzle inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Adjustment of sex allocation to co-foundress number and kinship under local mate competition: An inclusive-fitness analysis.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hamilton's theory of local mate competition (LMC) describes how competition between male relatives for mating opportunities favours a female-biased parental investment. LMC theory has been extended in many ways to explore a range of genetic and life-history influences on sex allocation strategies, including showing that increasing genetic homogeneity within mating groups should favour greater female bias. However, there has been no quantitative theoretical prediction as to how females should facultatively adjust their sex allocation in response to co-foundress number and kinship. This shortfall has been highlighted recently by the finding that sex ratios produced by sub-social parasitoid wasps in the family Bethylidae are affected by the number of co-foundresses and by whether these are sisters or unrelated females. Here we close this gap in LMC theory by taking an inclusive-fitness approach to derive explicit theoretical predictions for this scenario. We find that, in line with the recent empirical results, females should adopt a more female-biased sex allocation when their co-foundresses are less numerous and are their sisters. Our model appears to predict somewhat more female bias than is observed empirically; we discuss a number of possible model extensions that would improve realism and that would be expected to result in a closer quantitative fit with experimental data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.