Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078506›Full record

ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2020

Adjustment of sex allocation to co-foundress number and kinship under local mate competition: An inclusive-fitness analysis.

Andy Gardner, Ian C W Hardy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A solution to a sex ratio puzzle inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andy GardnerSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1304-3734
Ian C W HardySchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5846-3150

Funding

European Research Council 771387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hamilton's theory of local mate competition (LMC) describes how competition between male relatives for mating opportunities favours a female-biased parental investment. LMC theory has been extended in many ways to explore a range of genetic and life-history influences on sex allocation strategies, including showing that increasing genetic homogeneity within mating groups should favour greater female bias. However, there has been no quantitative theoretical prediction as to how females should facultatively adjust their sex allocation in response to co-foundress number and kinship. This shortfall has been highlighted recently by the finding that sex ratios produced by sub-social parasitoid wasps in the family Bethylidae are affected by the number of co-foundresses and by whether these are sisters or unrelated females. Here we close this gap in LMC theory by taking an inclusive-fitness approach to derive explicit theoretical predictions for this scenario. We find that, in line with the recent empirical results, females should adopt a more female-biased sex allocation when their co-foundresses are less numerous and are their sisters. Our model appears to predict somewhat more female bias than is observed empirically; we discuss a number of possible model extensions that would improve realism and that would be expected to result in a closer quantitative fit with experimental data.

Indexed as

InbreedingModels, GeneticSex RatioSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleMalePloidiesWaspsfoundress kinshiplocal mate competitionparasitoidsex ratio

Identifiers

PMID33078506
PMCPMC8247433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.