Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078420›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2021

A theoretical model of contraceptive decision-making and behaviour in diabetes: A qualitative application of the Health Belief Model.

Emily Johnson, Melissa DeJonckheere, Andrea L Oliverio, Kathryn S Brown, Murphy Van Sparrentak, Justine P Wu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Implementation of an EMS-based naloxone distribution program: A qualitative evaluation.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily JohnsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2133-4950
Melissa DeJonckheereDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2660-3358
Andrea L OliverioDepartment of Internal Medicine - Nephrology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1735-7706
Kathryn S BrownDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0835-2516
Murphy Van SparrentakDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Justine P WuDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4646-8410
University of Michigan · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WILLIAM H HERMAN · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002241 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELLINGROD, VICKI L · 2017 to 2021
$6.9M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002242 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOLINSTAT, MICHAEL ALLAN · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Developing a decision aid for reproductive health for women with kidney diseaseK23DK123413 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI OLIVERIO, ANDREA L · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
Improving Contraceptive Care for Women with Chronic Conditions: A Novel, Web-Based Decision Aid in Primary CareK23HD084744 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WU, JUSTINE P · 2017 to 2021
$842k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002241NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002242NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD084744NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK123413NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPeople with diabetes have contraceptive needs that have been inadequately addressed. The aim of this qualitative study was to develop a theoretical model that reflects contraceptive decision-making and behaviour in the setting of diabetes mellitus.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews of 17 women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes from Michigan, USA. Participants were recruited from a diabetes registry and local clinics. We adapted domains from the Health Belief Model (HBM) and applied reproductive justice principles to inform the qualitative data collection and analysis. Using an iterative coding template, we advanced from descriptive to theoretical codes, compared codes across characteristics of interest (e.g. diabetes type), and synthesized the theoretical codes and their relationships in an explanatory model.

resultsThe final model included the following constructs and themes: perceived barriers and benefits to contraceptive use (effects on blood sugar, risk of diabetes-related complications, improved quality of life); perceived seriousness of pregnancy (harm to self, harm to foetus or baby); perceived susceptibility to pregnancy risks (diabetes is a 'high risk' state); external cues to action (one-size-fits-all/anxiety-provoking counselling vs. personalized/trust-based counselling); internal cues to action (self-perceived 'sickness'); self-efficacy (reproductive self-efficacy, contraceptive self-efficacy); and modifying factors (perceptions of biased counselling based upon one's age, race or severity of disease).

conclusionsThis novel adaptation of the HBM highlights the need for condition-specific and person-centred contraceptive counselling for those with diabetes.

Indexed as

Health Belief ModelQualitative ResearchAdolescentAdultContraceptive AgentsCounselingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Family Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeYoung AdultContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID33078420
PMCPMC8053733
OpenAlexW3093169546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.