Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078354›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Assessment of co-composting of sewage sludge, woodchips, and sawdust: feedstock quality and design and compilation of computational model.

Somayeh Golbaz, Mir Zaman Zamanzadeh, Hasan Pasalari, Mahdi Farzadkia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Somayeh GolbazDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mir Zaman ZamanzadehDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hasan PasalariResearch Center for Environmental Health Technology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi FarzadkiaResearch Center for Environmental Health Technology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. farzadkia.m@iums.ac.ir.

Funding

Iran University of Medical Sciences 24535-27-01-93
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Composting process of sewage sludge requires a preprocessing step in order to prepare the appropriate mixture of dewatered sludge (Xs) with amendment (Xa), bulking agent (Xb), and/or recycled materials (Xr). This research aimed to develop a novel mathematical model for finding an optimal mixture ratio of dewatered sludge with the aforementioned influencing elements on co-composting process. Seven feasible scenarios were presented and the best one was selected in viewpoint of technical and economic perspectives. The optimum mixture was prepared and its quality was evaluated in the terms of physical, chemical, and microbial characteristics. The optimum mixture was loaded in an aerated static pile composting reactor in order to evaluate the quality of the final compost product. If the test results were not in compliance with the USEPA standards, the model was iteratively modified to fulfill the desired objective. The model was validated using the experimental results. The mixture of Xs:Xa:Xb:Xr with a weight ratio 7.4:1.0:1.4:2.3 allowed optimal moisture content (59.8 ± 0.5%), organic matter (80.0 ± 2.6%), dry matter (40.2 ± 0.6%), C/N ratio (28.0 ± 1.6), and free air space (> 30%) across the composting pile. The final product of compost met the heavy metal and microbial requirements for land application. It can be concluded this mathematical model is a promising method for selecting the optimal amount and type of materials for preparing the initial mixture of co-composting process.

Indexed as

CompostingMetals, HeavyRecyclingSewageSoilWoodMetals, HeavySewageSoilAerated static pileAmendmentBiosolidsBulking agentCo-composting processMathematical modelTechnical scenario

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.