ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021
Thrombus-First Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Bile Duct Tumor Thrombus.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Bile Duct Tumor Thrombus: A Case Series and Review of Treatment Options.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Postoperative Adjuvant Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Patient Selection and Clinical Predictors of Therapeutic Benefit.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Review
- Effect of bile duct resection on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with extrahepatic bile duct tumor thrombus.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Chinese expert consensus on refined diagnosis, treatment, and management of advanced primary liver cancer (2023 edition).Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- [Expert consensus on precise diagnosis and management of primary hepatocellular carcinoma in advanced stage (2023 version)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023Article
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Bile Duct Tumor Thrombus: A Case Report and Literature Review of 890 Patients Affected by Uncommon Primary Liver Tumor Presentation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Prognostic Comparison Between Liver Resection and Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Bile Duct Tumor Thrombus: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Bile Duct Tumor Thrombus: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe optimal surgical method of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and bile duct tumor thrombus (BDTT) is still controversial. This study aims to investigate the impact of different surgical methods on BDTT patients.
methodsA multicenter retrospective study was carried out on HCC patients with BDTT who underwent surgery. The survival outcomes of different operation methods were studied.
resultsA total of 120 HCC patients with BDTT from 5 different clinical centers were included. The median disease-free survival (DFS) of the bile duct resection (BDR) group was significantly better than that of the non-BDR group (24.6 months vs. 18.9 months, p = 0.034), but the overall survival (OS) was similar between the two groups (33.6 months vs. 32.3 months, p = 0.193). When we divided the non-BDR group into two groups according to the operation sequence of the hepatic tumor and BDTT, we found that the OS of the thrombus-first group was significantly longer than that of the tumor-first group (42.7 months vs. 23.6 months, p = 0.016). When compared with the BDR group, the thrombus-first group showed similar OS (42.7 months vs. 33.6 months, p = 0.653) and DFS (24.7 months vs. 24.6 months, p = 0.150), which may be the reason the OS rate of the BDR group was similar to that of the non-BDR group.
conclusionsA thrombus-first technique could be considered for HCC patients with extrahepatic BDTT, especially for those patients in which the tumor thrombus did not invade the bile duct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33078320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.