Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078319›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

The Significance of Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis in Low Rectal Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Study.

Liming Wang, Yasumitsu Hirano, Gregory Heng, Toshimasa Ishii, Hiroka Kondo, Kiyoka Hara, Nao Obara, Masahiro Asari, Shigeki Yamaguchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liming WangDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. wuminami@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7476-0828
Yasumitsu HiranoDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Gregory HengDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Toshimasa IshiiDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroka KondoDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Kiyoka HaraDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Nao ObaraDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Masahiro AsariDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Shigeki YamaguchiDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe indications for lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in rectal cancer have been controversial. The purpose of this study was to clarify the significance of lateral lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer.

methodsThis was a retrospective study at a high-volume cancer center in Japan. In this study, 40 patients with pathologically positive LLN (LLN+) were matched with 175 negative (LLN-) patients by propensity score matching (PSM). COX regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors related to prognosis. The relapse-free survival rate (RFS) and overall survival rate (OS) of the 2 groups before and after matching were analyzed.

resultsOf the 64 patients undergoing LLND, 40 (62.5%) patients had LLN+ disease. The LLN+ patients showed deeper infiltration of the primary tumor than the LLN- patients (T3-T4: 87.5% vs. 72.0%; p = 0.044), a greater number of metastatic lymph nodes (N2: 75.0% vs. 35.4%; p < 0.001), and a higher rate of local recurrence (30% vs. 9.1%; p < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more common in the 40 LLN+ patients than in the 175 LLN- patients (70.0% vs. 46.8%; p = 0.008). After relapse, the rate of first-line chemotherapy administration for LLN+ patients was higher than that for the LLN- patients (62.5% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.005). The RFS of LLN+ patients was shorter than that of the LLN- patients (p = 0.005). After PSM, although more LLN+ patients received adjuvant chemotherapy than the LLN- patients (70.0% vs. 40.0%; p = 0.007), the local recurrence rate remained higher (30% vs. 10%; p = 0.025). The differences between RFS (p = 0.655) and OS rates (p = 0.164) of the 2 patient groups were not significant.

conclusionEven after LLND, patients with LLN+ low rectal cancer still showed an elevated local recurrence rate. Controlling local recurrence by adjuvant chemotherapy alone is difficult, and the additional strategic treatments are needed.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalRectal NeoplasmsHumansJapanLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesLateral lymph node dissectionLow rectal cancerPropensity score matching

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.