Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078292›Full record

ArticleInvertebrate neuroscience : IN2020

Effect of photoperiod and light intensity on learning ability and memory formation of the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis.

Ahmed A A Hussein, El-Sayed Baz, Janine Mariën, Menerva M Tadros, Nahla S El-Shenawy, Joris M Koene

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Invertebrate neuroscience : IN, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neural mechanism of circadian clock-based photoperiodism in insects and snails.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Photoperiod controls egg laying and caudodorsal cell hormone expression but not gonadal development in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed A A HusseinDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. Ahmed.abdelazeez@science.suez.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0002-1427-1026
El-Sayed BazDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. e.baz@science.suez.edu.eg.
Janine MariënDepartment of Ecological Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Menerva M TadrosMalacology Lab, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Giza, Egypt.
Nahla S El-ShenawyDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Joris M KoeneDepartment of Ecological Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suez Canal University · EGVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLTheodor Bilharz Research Institute · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural light is regarded as a key regulator of biological systems and typically serves as a Zeitgeber for biological rhythms. As a natural abiotic factor, it is recognized to regulate multiple behavioral and physiological processes in animals. Disruption of the natural light regime due to light pollution may result in significant effects on animal learning and memory development. Here, we investigated whether sensitivity to various photoperiods or light intensities had an impact on intermediate-term memory (ITM) and long-term memory (LTM) formation in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis. We also investigated the change in the gene expression level of molluscan insulin-related peptide II (MIP II) is response to the given light treatments. The results show that the best light condition for proper LTM formation is exposure to a short day (8 h light) and low light intensity (1 and 10 lx). Moreover, the more extreme light conditions (16 h and 24 h light) prevent the formation of both ITM and LTM. We found no change in MIP II expression in any of the light treatments, which may indicate that MIP II is not directly involved in the operant conditioning used here, even though it is known to be involved in learning. The finding that snails did not learn in complete darkness indicates that light is a necessary factor for proper learning and memory formation. Furthermore, dim light enhances both ITM and LTM formation, which suggests that there is an optimum since both no light and too bright light prevented learning and memory. Our findings suggest that the upsurge of artificial day length and/or night light intensity may also negatively impact memory consolidation in the wild.

Indexed as

LearningMemoryPhotoperiodAnimalsBehavior, AnimalLightLymnaeaConditioningGastropodLight intensityMemoryMIP IIMolluskPhotoperiod

Identifiers

PMID33078292
PMCPMC7572358
OpenAlexW3092873008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.