ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021
Comparison of mitral annular displacement and global longitudinal strain imaging for predicting significant coronary atherosclerotic disease in patients of chronic stable angina pectoris.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tissue motion annular displacement to assess the left ventricular systolic function in healthy cats.Veterinary research communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial strain by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) is a validated clinical index of myocardial deformation, for predicting CAD in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris (CSAP) with preserved ejection fraction (EF). However, it is complex, imaging dependant with intra and intervendor variability. The mitral annulus displacement (MAD) has been correlated to left ventricular (LV) longitudinal deformation and may be interchanged with strain imaging. This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with suspected CSAP (n = 146) and preserved LVEF without wall motion abnormalities. We excluded patients with prior heart disease, ACS, arrhythmia, heart failure or poor imaging. GLS, Average MAD and normalized MAD were calculated using 2D-STE by automated function imaging. CAG was gold standard. MAD had significantly lesser dropout due to suboptimal imaging. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that GLS had significantly better area under curve (AUC) compared to Normalised MAD and Average MAD (P = 0.035) in predicting significant CAD in patients of CSAP. The optimal cut-off of GLS, normalized MAD and Average MAD were ≥ - 20.67% (sensitivity 94.2%, specificity 86.7%), ≤ 15.22% (sensitivity 90.7%, specificity 80%) and ≤ 11.18 mm (sensitivity 83.7%, specificity 71.1%) respectively. GLS showed strong correlation with Normalised MAD (R = 0.669, P < 0.001) and good correlation to Average MAD (R 0.572, P < 0.001). Absolute GLS and Normalised MAD showed significant inverse correlation to SYNTAX score. GLS is a more accurate measure for predicting presence and severity of CAD then MAD however latter is a reliable simpler, robust, and expeditious tool with lesser dropouts. It can be at least of complementary value to other imaging markers for myocardial function when LV curvatures are poorly visualized or in busy outdoors with time constraint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33078275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.