ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2021
A risk score model to predict in-hospital mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease and acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of CALLY index in combination with the GRACE score among patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- A Novel MPT-Driven Necrosis-Related lncRNA Signature for Prognostic Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Validation Using Organoids.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- The Prognostic Value of D-Dimer in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study in Taiwan.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2024Article
- Predictors on outcomes of cardiovascular disease of male patients in Malaysia using Bayesian network analysis.BMJ open · 2023Article
- The impact of end-stage kidney disease on mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction: A nationwide study.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023Article
- The Performance of Risk Scores for Bleeding and Ischemia as Outcome Predictors in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2022Article
- Prognostic value of plasma phenylalanine and gut microbiota-derived metabolite phenylacetylglutamine in coronary in-stent restenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- D-dimer for risk stratification and antithrombotic treatment management in acute coronary syndrome patients: asystematic review and metanalysis.Thrombosis journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) significantly increases the rate of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. In this study, we aimed to establish a risk score (RS) model to predict in-hospital mortality risk in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A total of 113 consecutive patients with ESRD and AMI were retrospectively enrolled between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. All patients received regular hemodialysis and were divided into two groups according to the prognosis during hospitalization. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors of in-hospital mortality. A RS model was developed based on multiple regression analysis and was internally validated using 1000 bootstrap analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed, and the area under curve (AUC) was analyzed to evaluate the performance of the RS model. AUCs were compared using the Z test. Thirty-three patients died during hospitalization, resulting in in-hospital mortality rate of 29.2%. After multivariate logistic regression, an RS model (0-8) was established based on five independent factors that were assigned with different points according to relative coefficients (coefficient of the index risk factor divided by the lowest coefficient among these five risk factors; rounded to closest integer): 1 for C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 14.2 mg/L and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ V3%; 2 for age ≥ 65 years old, heart rate (HR) at admission ≥ 86 beats per minute (bpm) and D-dimer ≥ 2.4 mg/L FEU. The present RS model had a sensitivity of 85.7%, the specificity of 84%, and an accuracy of 78.1%. In ROC curve analysis, the model demonstrated a good discriminate power in predicting in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.895, 95% CI 0.814-0.96; P < 0.001), which was significantly better than the predictive power of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score (GRACE RS) (AUC = 0.754, 95% CI 0.641-0.868; P < 0.001 after Z test). A novel RS model, which was established to help predict in-hospital mortality of patients with ESRD and AMI, was easy to use and had higher accuracy than the GRACE RS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33078224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.