Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078212›Full record

Observational studyAesthetic plastic surgery2021

Sub-muscular Reconstruction after NAC Sparing Mastectomy: Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction with Human ADM Versus Tissue Expander.

Rossella Sgarzani, Silvia Pasquali, Federico Buggi, Daniela Tognali, Francesco Marongiu, Matteo Mingozzi, Davide Melandri, Paolo Giovanni Morselli, Annalisa Curcio

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rossella SgarzaniServizio di Chirurgia Plastica, Centro Grandi Ustionati, Ospedale M. Bufalini, AUSL Romagna, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti 286, 47521, Cesena, Italy. rossella.sgarzani@auslromagna.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5543-8013
Silvia PasqualiChirurgia Plastica, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Federico BuggiChirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Daniela TognaliChirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Francesco MarongiuChirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Matteo MingozziChirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Davide MelandriServizio di Chirurgia Plastica, Centro Grandi Ustionati, Ospedale M. Bufalini, AUSL Romagna, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti 286, 47521, Cesena, Italy.
Paolo Giovanni MorselliChirurgia Plastica, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Annalisa CurcioChirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Ospedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNipple areola complex (NAC) sparing mastectomy allows good oncological and aesthetic results. The study compares the results, in terms of self-evaluated satisfaction and symmetry, of direct to implant (DTI) sub-muscular breast reconstruction, with the aid of human acellular dermal matrix (ADM) versus two-stage reconstruction with sub-muscular tissue expander, followed by implant. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a retrospective, observational, single-center, non-randomized, case-control study. Inclusion criteria were: unilateral NAC sparing mastectomy at Forlì Hospital between 2014 and 2018; sub-muscular reconstruction; minimum follow-up of 12 months from the reconstructive stage; no history of radiotherapy. Patients were divided into two groups: group A included patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction with the aid of human ADM; group B were those who underwent a two-stage reconstruction with tissue expander then implant. We collected data on: (1) Self-evaluated satisfaction by Breast Q questionnaire (scores from 0 to 100). (2) Observer-evaluated symmetry. Bi-dimensional photographs were collected and evaluated by 11 breast surgeons blinded to each other, who assigned a score for symmetry (from 0 to 10). (3) Symmetry of anthropometric measures collected by hand and volume estimated by Breast V application.

resultsGroup A included 28 patients; group included B 26 patients. Breast-Q questionnaires reported the following results: satisfaction with breasts in group A 65 ± 12 versus group B 68 ± 14; satisfaction with outcome in group A 88 ± 16 versus group B 93 ± 11; psychosocial well-being in group A 71 ± 20 versus group B 76 ± 17; sexual well-being in group A 63 ± 26 versus group B 60 ± 13; physical well-being in group A 68 ± 15 versus group B 60 ± 12. The average symmetry breast score assigned to group A was 6.9, versus group B 7.2. Regarding the anthropometric measures in group A, the differences between right and left were major to those in group B. Regarding breast volume, the mean difference between right and left in group A was 31.89 cc ± 24.97, whereas in group B was 25.46 cc ± 23.59.

conclusionOur data show better symmetry and better psychosocial well-being in the two-stage reconstruction, and higher satisfaction with sexual and physical well-being in DTI reconstructions. These aspects should be discussed with the patient while collecting the informed consent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsMammaplastyCase-Control StudiesHumansMastectomyNipplesRetrospective StudiesTissue Expansion DevicesTreatment OutcomeBreast-QBreast reconstructionBreast symmetryNAC sparing mastectomy

Identifiers

PMID33078212
OpenAlexW3093473610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.