Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33078088›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental sciences Europe2020

Climate change: Does international research fulfill global demands and necessities?

Doris Klingelhöfer, Ruth Müller, Markus Braun, Dörthe Brüggmann, David A Groneberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental sciences Europe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Surgical Education Within Planetary Health Curricula: A Global Environmental Scan (2022-2025).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Doris KlingelhöferInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0716-9872
Ruth MüllerInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Markus BraunInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Dörthe BrüggmannInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
David A GronebergInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClimate change is safe to be one of the biggest challenges of mankind. Human activities, especially the combustion of fossil fuels, contribute to the increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and thus to the pace of climate change. The effects of climate change are already being felt, and the resulting damage will most likely be enormous worldwide. Because global impacts vary widely and will lead to very different national vulnerability to climate impacts, each country, depending on its economic background, has different options to ward off negative impacts. Decisions have to be made to mitigate climate consequences according to the preparedness and the vulnerability of countries against the presumed impacts. This requires a profound scientific basis. To provide sound background information, a bibliometric study was conducted to present global research on climate change using established and specific parameters. Bibliometric standard parameters, established socioeconomic values, and climate change specific indices were used for the analyses. This allowed us to provide an overall picture of the global research pattern not only in terms of general aspects, but also in terms of climate change impacts, its effects and regional differences. For this purpose, we choose representative indices, such as the CO

resultsIn terms of absolute publication numbers, the USA was the leading country, followed by the UK, and China in 3rd place. The steep rise in Chinese publication numbers over time came into view, while their citation numbers are relatively low. Scandinavian countries were leading regarding their publication numbers related to CO

conclusionsWe could show that there exists an inequity between national research efforts according to the publication output and the demands and necessities of countries related to their socioeconomic status. This inequity calls for a rethink, a different approach, and a different policy to improve countries' preparedness and mitigation capacity, which requires the inclusion of the most affected regions of the world in a strengthened international cooperation network.

Indexed as

BibliometricsClimate inequityGlobal warmingGreenhouse effectResearch investmentSocioeconomic indices

Identifiers

PMID33078088
PMCPMC7558256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.