Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33077927›Full record

ReviewNature chemistry2020

Exploiting attractive non-covalent interactions for the enantioselective catalysis of reactions involving radical intermediates.

Rupert S J Proctor, Avene C Colgan, Robert J Phipps

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rupert S J ProctorDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-448X
Avene C ColganDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3842-6077
Robert J PhippsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. rjp71@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7383-5469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has seen unprecedented growth in the development of new chemical methods that proceed by mechanisms involving radical intermediates. This new attention has served to highlight a long-standing challenge in the field of radical chemistry - that of controlling absolute stereochemistry. This Review will examine developments using a strategy that offers enormous potential, in which attractive non-covalent interactions between a chiral catalyst and the substrate are leveraged to exert enantiocontrol. In a simplistic sense, such an approach mimics the modes of activation and control in enzyme catalysis and the realization that this can be achieved in the context of small-molecule catalysts has had sizable impact on the field of asymmetric catalysis in recent years. This strategy is now starting to quickly gather pace as a powerful approach for control of enantioselectivity in radical reactions and we hope that this focused survey of progress so far will inspire future developments in the area.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.