Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33077862›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A pioneer calf foetus microbiome.

Cesar E Guzman, Jennifer L Wood, Eleonora Egidi, Alison C White-Monsant, Lucie Semenec, Sylvia V H Grommen, Elisa L Hill-Yardin, Bert De Groef, Ashley E Franks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cesar E GuzmanDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Jennifer L WoodDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Eleonora EgidiDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Alison C White-MonsantDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, Centre for Agribiosciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Lucie SemenecDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Sylvia V H GrommenDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Elisa L Hill-YardinSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Clements Drive, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Bert De GroefDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Ashley E FranksDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia. A.Franks@latrobe.edu.au.
La Trobe University · AURMIT University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foetus sterility until parturition is under debate due to reports of microorganisms in the foetal environment and meconium. Sufficient controls to overcome sample contamination and provide direct evidence of microorganism viability in the pre-rectal gastrointestinal tract (GIT) have been lacking. We conducted molecular and culture-based analyses to investigate the presence of a microbiome in the foetal GIT of calves at 5, 6 and 7 months gestation, while controlling for contamination. The 5 components of the GIT (ruminal fluid, ruminal tissue, caecal fluid, caecal tissue and meconium) and amniotic fluid were found to contain a pioneer microbiome of distinct bacterial and archaeal communities. Bacterial and archaeal richness varied between GIT components. The dominant bacterial phyla in amniotic fluid differed to those in ruminal and caecal fluids and meconium. The lowest bacterial and archaeal abundances were associated with ruminal tissues. Viable bacteria unique to the ruminal fluids, which were not found in the controls from 5, 6 and 7 months gestation, were cultured, subcultured, sequenced and identified. We report that the foetal GIT is not sterile but is spatially colonised before birth by a pioneer microbiome.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaCattleFetusGastrointestinal Tract

Identifiers

PMID33077862
PMCPMC7572361
OpenAlexW3093462901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.