Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33077660›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2020

An Exposure-Response Perspective on the Clinical Dose of Pretomanid.

Jerry R Nedelman, David H Salinger, Vishak Subramoney, Rob Woolson, Karen Wade, Mengchun Li, Daniel Everitt, Carl M Mendel, Mel Spigelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Pharmacology of emerging drugs for the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Review
  6. Analysis of Dynamic Efficacy Endpoints of the Nix-TB Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  7. New and Repurposed Drugs for the Treatment of Active Tuberculosis: An Update for Clinicians.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2023
    Review
  8. Pretomanid for tuberculosis treatment: an update for clinical purposes.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jerry R NedelmanTB Alliance, New York, New York, USA Jerry.Nedelman@tballiance.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0205-522X
David H SalingerCertara Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Vishak SubramoneyCertara Strategic Consulting, Quebec, Canada.
Rob WoolsonRho, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Karen WadeRho, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Mengchun LiTB Alliance, New York, New York, USA.
Daniel EverittTB Alliance, New York, New York, USA.
Carl M MendelTB Alliance, New York, New York, USA.
Mel SpigelmanTB Alliance, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pretomanid was approved by the U.S. FDA, via the limited population pathway for antibacterial and antifungal drugs, as part of a three-drug regimen with bedaquiline and linezolid for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant and treatment-intolerant or nonresponsive multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The recommended dose of pretomanid is 200 mg once daily with food. The objective of this work was to retrospectively evaluate this recommended dose by means of exposure-response (E-R) modeling applied to outcomes of both efficacy and safety. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was used, with the steady-state average pretomanid concentration as the exposure metric. The efficacy outcome was time to sputum culture conversion (TSCC) to negative. The safety outcomes were times to the first occurrence of adverse events in classes selected from either pretomanid's investigator brochure or the new drug application (NDA) submission as recognized safety signals for pretomanid based on preclinical as well as clinical experience. Significant E-R relationships were found for TSCC and two adverse-event classes, vomiting (a single preferred term) and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (a collection of related terms). No significant E-R relationships were found for the single preferred terms nausea, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, and headache and for the collections hepatic disorders, transaminases increased, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and headache. The results suggest that the recommended dose of pretomanid, 200 mg given in the fed state, is appropriate over the range of pharmacokinetic exposures.

Indexed as

NitroimidazolesTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAntitubercular AgentsHumansRetrospective StudiesAntitubercular AgentsNitroimidazolespretomanidantimicrobial agentspretomanidtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID33077660
PMCPMC7927811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.