Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33077604›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Acceleration of plague outbreaks in the second pandemic.

David J D Earn, Junling Ma, Hendrik Poinar, Jonathan Dushoff, Benjamin M Bolker

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David J D EarnDepartment of Mathematics & Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada; earn@math.mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7562-1341
Junling MaDepartment of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3R4, Canada.
Hendrik PoinarDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0314-4160
Jonathan DushoffDepartment of Mathematics & Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0506-4794
Benjamin M BolkerDepartment of Mathematics & Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2127-0443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historical records reveal the temporal patterns of a sequence of plague epidemics in London, United Kingdom, from the 14th to 17th centuries. Analysis of these records shows that later epidemics spread significantly faster ("accelerated"). Between the Black Death of 1348 and the later epidemics that culminated with the Great Plague of 1665, we estimate that the epidemic growth rate increased fourfold. Currently available data do not provide enough information to infer the mode of plague transmission in any given epidemic; nevertheless, order-of-magnitude estimates of epidemic parameters suggest that the observed slow growth rates in the 14th century are inconsistent with direct (pneumonic) transmission. We discuss the potential roles of demographic and ecological factors, such as climate change or human or rat population density, in driving the observed acceleration.

Indexed as

AnimalsHistory, 15th CenturyHistory, 16th CenturyHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, MedievalHumansLondonPandemicsPlaguePopulation DensityRatsCOVID-19epidemic growth rateLondonplaguereproduction number

Identifiers

PMID33077604
PMCPMC7959508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.