Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33077569›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Association between neutrophil-to-albumin ratio and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: a retrospective cohort study.

Yangpei Peng, Yangjing Xue, Jinsheng Wang, Huaqiang Xiang, Kangting Ji, Jie Wang, Cong Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The role of neutrophils in vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Is it time for a SAH clinical trial targeting neutrophils?Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yangpei PengDepartment of Nephrology, Wenzhou Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8122-3374
Yangjing XueDepartment of Cardiology, Wenzhou Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jinsheng WangDepartment of Cardiology, Wenzhou Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9930-7114
Huaqiang XiangDepartment of Cardiology, Wenzhou Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1911-4089
Kangting JiDepartment of Cardiology, Wenzhou Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-9746
Jie WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Yanbian University Hospital, Yanji, Jilin, China.
Cong LinDepartment of Cardiology, Wenzhou Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China lincong0577@aliyun.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR) in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock (CS).

designA retrospective cohort study.

settingA single centre in Boston, USA.

participants475 patients with CS were included, among which 272 (57.3%) were men and 328 (69.1%) were white. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was 90-day mortality and the secondary outcomes were 30-day and 365-day mortality.

resultsA significant positive correlation between NAR levels and 90-day, 30-day or 365-day mortality was observed. For 90-day mortality, the adjusted HR (95% CI) values given NAR levels 23.54-27.86 and >27.86 were 1.71 (1.14 to 2.55) and 1.93 (1.27 to 2.93) compared with the reference (NAR<23.47). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed that NAR had a certain prognostic value in predicting 90-day mortality of CS, which was more sensitive than the neutrophil percentage or the serum albumin level alone (0.651 vs 0.509, 0.584). For the secondary outcomes, the upward trend remained statistically significant.

conclusionsNAR level was associated with the mortality of CS patients. The prognostic value of NAR was more sensitive than the neutrophil percentage or the serum albumin level alone, but not as good as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment or Simplified Acute Physiology Score.

Indexed as

NeutrophilsShock, CardiogenicAlbuminsBostonCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesAlbuminsadult cardiologycardiologyintensive & critical care

Identifiers

PMID33077569
PMCPMC7574943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.