Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33077558›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2020

Prognostic models for predicting in-hospital paediatric mortality in resource-limited countries: a systematic review.

Morris Ogero, Rachel Jelagat Sarguta, Lucas Malla, Jalemba Aluvaala, Ambrose Agweyu, Mike English, Nelson Owuor Onyango, Samuel Akech

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Morris OgeroSchool of Mathematics, University of Nairobi College of Biological and Physical Sciences, Nairobi, Kenya mogero@kemri-wellcome.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0117-6289
Rachel Jelagat SargutaSchool of Mathematics, University of Nairobi College of Biological and Physical Sciences, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lucas MallaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jalemba AluvaalaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ambrose AgweyuHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mike EnglishHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nelson Owuor OnyangoSchool of Mathematics, University of Nairobi College of Biological and Physical Sciences, Nairobi, Kenya.
Samuel AkechHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092654Wellcome Trust 107769Wellcome Trust 203077Wellcome Trust 207522Wellcome Trust 207522/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify and appraise the methodological rigour of multivariable prognostic models predicting in-hospital paediatric mortality in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

designSystematic review of peer-reviewed journals. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Google Scholar and Web of Science electronic databases since inception to August 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included model development studies predicting in-hospital paediatric mortality in LMIC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: This systematic review followed the Checklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies framework. The risk of bias assessment was conducted using Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). No quantitative summary was conducted due to substantial heterogeneity that was observed after assessing the studies included.

resultsOur search strategy identified a total of 4054 unique articles. Among these, 3545 articles were excluded after review of titles and abstracts as they covered non-relevant topics. Full texts of 509 articles were screened for eligibility, of which 15 studies reporting 21 models met the eligibility criteria. Based on the PROBAST tool, risk of bias was assessed in four domains; participant, predictors, outcome and analyses. The domain of statistical analyses was the main area of concern where none of the included models was judged to be of low risk of bias.

conclusionThis review identified 21 models predicting in-hospital paediatric mortality in LMIC. However, most reports characterising these models are of poor quality when judged against recent reporting standards due to a high risk of bias. Future studies should adhere to standardised methodological criteria and progress from identifying new risk scores to validating or adapting existing scores. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018088599.

Indexed as

HospitalsBiasChildHospital MortalityHumansPrognosispaediatric intensive & critical carepaediatricsstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID33077558
PMCPMC7574949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.