Observational studyOpen heart2020
Pregnancy in a healthy population: dynamics of NTproBNP and hs-cTroponin T.
Observational study in Open heart, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Biomarkers and Pregnancy-Associated Cardiovascular Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular biomarkers and preeclampsia: A narrative review.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Review
- Cardiac Biomarkers in Pregnancies With and Without Hypertension.American journal of hypertension · 2025Article
- Pregnancy-Related Thromboembolism-Current Challenges at the Emergency Department.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Contemporary Management of Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure in Pregnancy.Cardiology and therapy · 2024Review
- Variations in NT-proBNP Levels in Pregnant Patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Consequences for the Newborns.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Prevalence and Correlates of Elevated NT-proBNP in Pregnant Women in the General U.S. Population.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the intraindividual changes of heart biomarker levels during and after pregnancy and to evaluate existing cut-off levels for heart failure or myocardial ischaemia in pregnant women.
methodA total of 196 healthy pregnant women were recruited from maternal outpatient clinics and included in the study. Blood samples were obtained on four occasions: at 10-12 gestational weeks (gw), 20-25 gw, after delivery and 6 months postpartum and analysed for N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) and high sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTNT). Echocardiography ruled out existing cardiac disease. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated.
resultsThere were significant changes in NTproBNP between the measurements with the highest NTproBNP at 10-12 gw and the lowest value being at 20-25 gw, (with eGFR being the highest). Hs-cTNT was significantly higher at the peripartum measurement compared with the other measurements (p<0.05). Regardless, the 95th percentile for both biomarkers was below cut-off levels of 300 ng/L for NTproBNP and 14 ng/L for hs-cTNT. There was an association between NTproBNP above the upper limit of normal of 125 ng/L and eGFR (p=0.04) and between hs-cTNT >5.0 ng/L and time from delivery to blood sample (p=0.001) at the peripartum measurement. Both were associated with the use of oxytocin.
conclusionExisting cut-off values for ruling out heart failure (NTproBNP <300 ng/L) and myocardial ischaemia (hs-cTNT <14 ng/L) are applicable during pregnancy and after delivery. Elevated levels mandate further attention on cardiac symptoms and renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.