Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33077494›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Behavioral Disassociation of Perceived Sweet Taste Intensity and Hedonically Positive Palatability.

Esmeralda Fonseca, Vicente Sandoval-Herrera, Sidney A Simon, Ranier Gutierrez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esmeralda FonsecaDepartment of Pharmacology, CINVESTAV, Laboratory of Neurobiology of Appetite, Mexico City 07360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3697-9401
Vicente Sandoval-HerreraDepartment of Pharmacology, CINVESTAV, Laboratory of Neurobiology of Appetite, Mexico City 07360, Mexico.
Sidney A SimonDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.ORCID 0000-0002-7437-0149
Ranier GutierrezDepartment of Pharmacology, CINVESTAV, Laboratory of Neurobiology of Appetite, Mexico City 07360, Mexico ranier@cinvestav.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-9688-0289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensity of sucrose (its perceived concentration) and its palatability (positive hedonic valence associated with ingestion) are two taste attributes that increase its attractiveness and overconsumption. Although both sensory attributes covary, in that increases in sucrose concentration leads to similar increases in its palatability, this covariation does not imply that they are part of the same process or whether they represent separate processes. Both these possibilities are considered in the literature. For this reason, we tested whether sucrose's perceived intensity could be separated from its hedonically positive palatability. To address this issue, rats were trained in a sucrose intensity task to report the perceived intensity of a range of sucrose concentrations before and after its palatability was changed using a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) protocol. We found that the subjects' performance remained essentially unchanged, although its palatability was changed from hedonically positive to negative. Overall, these data demonstrate that sucrose's perceived intensity and its positive palatability can be dissociated, meaning that changes of one taste attribute render the other mostly unaffected. Thus, the intensity attribute is sufficient to inform the perceptual judgments of sucrose's concentrations.

Indexed as

TasteTaste PerceptionAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalFood PreferencesRatsSucroseSucroseintensitypalatabilitysucrosesweetnesstaste quality

Identifiers

PMID33077494
PMCPMC7598907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.