ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2020
Ceftriaxone Plus Methylprednisolone Combination Therapy Versus Methylprednisolone Monotherapy in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized, Triple-Blind Clinical Trial.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines do not suggest the routine use of methylprednisolone (MP) in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). We tested the hypothesis regarding whether combination therapy with ceftriaxone and MP is superior to MP monotherapy in patients with acute traumatic SCI.
methodsIn a randomized, triple-blind clinical trial, 60 patients with acute (first 8 hours of the injury) traumatic SCI were enrolled at the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran, between December 2016 and June 2017. Accordingly, the patients were randomly divided into 2 case and control groups (n = 30 each). Upon admission, all included patients received a bolus dose of MP at 33 mg/kg intravenously (IV) for 15 minutes. Then, after 45 minutes, MP infusion was continued for 24 to 48 hours at a 5.4 mg/kg IV dose. The case group received an additional dose of ceftriaxone at 1 g 2 times a day for 7 days through an IV route. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were checked and compared between case and control groups upon admission and on the fourth and eighth days. Also, sensory and motor functions were evaluated according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading score upon admission, on the third and seventh days, upon discharge and 6 months after admission.
resultsAnalyses showed a significant statistical difference between groups in the changes in CRP levels during days 1 and 4 (
conclusionThe addition of ceftriaxone to the routine therapeutic protocol of acute SCI is accompanied by improved inflammation markers and functional outcomes 6 months after the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.