Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33077221›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2021

Urban wildlife in times of COVID-19: What can we infer from novel carnivore records in urban areas?

Eduardo A Silva-Rodríguez, Nicolás Gálvez, George J F Swan, Jeremy J Cusack, Darío Moreira-Arce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Is the threatened land crabEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  7. Mammal Roadkills in Lithuanian Urban Areas: A 15-Year Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eduardo A Silva-RodríguezInstituto de Conservación, Biodiversidad y Territorio, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile. Electronic address: eduardo.silva@uach.cl.
Nicolás GálvezPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Wildlife Ecology and Coexistence Laboratory, Villarrica Campus, Centro de Investigación para el Desarrollo Local (CEDEL), Villarrica, La Araucanía, Chile.
George J F SwanInstituto de Conservación, Biodiversidad y Territorio, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Jeremy J CusackCentro de Modelación y Monitoreo de Ecosistemas, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Darío Moreira-ArceDepartamento de Gestión Agraria, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Laboratorio de Estudios del Antropoceno, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic brought an unusual decrease in human activity associated with partial and total lockdowns. Simultaneously, a series of wildlife sightings-mainly in urban areas-have been brought to public attention and often attributed to lockdown measures. Here we report on a series of wild carnivore records, including threatened species, obtained through camera traps set in urban forests, campuses, suburbs, and peri-urban areas of two cities in Chile, during partial lockdown measures. Our records are novel for Chile, a country where urban carnivore ecology is mostly unknown, and include the detection of four native carnivores, including the vulnerable güiña (Leopardus guigna) and the endangered southern river otter (Lontra provocax). These records also constitute a valuable baseline collected during partial lockdown measures in two cities of the Global South. We emphasize, however, that these findings cannot be used to argue for or against an effect of lockdown measures on wildlife. More generally, we call for caution in the interpretation of seemingly novel carnivore records during periods of lockdown and stress the value of international collaboration in evaluating the effects of the Anthropause on wildlife.

Indexed as

Animals, WildCOVID-19PandemicsAnimalsChileCitiesCommunicable Disease ControlHumansSARS-CoV-2ChileCOVID-19LockdownUrban wildlife ecology

Identifiers

PMID33077221
PMCPMC9757141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.