ArticleBMC biology2020
Automated identification of the mouse brain's spatial compartments from in situ sequencing data.
Article in BMC biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tissueformer: extending single-cell foundation models to predict population-level phenotypes.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Data-driven fine-grained region discovery in the mouse brain with transformers.Nature communications · 2025Article
- TissueFormer: a neural network for labeling tissue from grouped single-cell RNA profiles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Spatial Transcriptomics in Human Cardiac Tissue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Complete spatially resolved gene expression is not necessary for identifying spatial domains.Cell genomics · 2024Article
- Laser axial scanning microdissection for high-efficiency dissection from uneven biological samples.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Spatial tumour gene signature discriminates neoplastic from non-neoplastic compartments in colon cancer: unravelling predictive biomarkers for relapse.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Rolling circle extension-assisted loop-mediated isothermal amplification (Rol-LAMP) method for locus-specific and visible detection of RNA N6-methyladenosine.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Article
- Deep learning in spatial transcriptomics: Learning from the next next-generation sequencing.Biophysics reviews · 2023Review
- Scalable in situ single-cell profiling by electrophoretic capture of mRNA using EEL FISH.Nature biotechnology · 2023Article
- A guidebook of spatial transcriptomic technologies, data resources and analysis approaches.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- The emerging landscape of spatial profiling technologies.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the lineage progression of fine oligodendrocyte subtypes.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Comprehensive in situ mapping of human cortical transcriptomic cell types.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Matisse: a MATLAB-based analysis toolbox for in situ sequencing expression maps.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Hybridization-based in situ sequencing (HybISS) for spatially resolved transcriptomics in human and mouse brain tissue.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Automated identification of the mouse brain's spatial compartments from in situ sequencing data.BMC biology · 2020Article
- TissUUmaps: interactive visualization of large-scale spatial gene expression and tissue morphology data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeuroanatomical compartments of the mouse brain are identified and outlined mainly based on manual annotations of samples using features related to tissue and cellular morphology, taking advantage of publicly available reference atlases. However, this task is challenging since sliced tissue sections are rarely perfectly parallel or angled with respect to sections in the reference atlas and organs from different individuals may vary in size and shape and requires manual annotation. With the advent of in situ sequencing technologies and automated approaches, it is now possible to profile the gene expression of targeted genes inside preserved tissue samples and thus spatially map biological processes across anatomical compartments.
resultsHere, we show how in situ sequencing data combined with dimensionality reduction and clustering can be used to identify spatial compartments that correspond to known anatomical compartments of the brain. We also visualize gradients in gene expression and sharp as well as smooth transitions between different compartments. We apply our method on mouse brain sections and show that a fully unsupervised approach can computationally define anatomical compartments, which are highly reproducible across individuals, using as few as 18 gene markers. We also show that morphological variation does not always follow gene expression, and different spatial compartments can be defined by various cell types with common morphological features but distinct gene expression profiles.
conclusionWe show that spatial gene expression data can be used for unsupervised and unbiased annotations of mouse brain spatial compartments based only on molecular markers, without the need of subjective manual annotations based on tissue and cell morphology or matching reference atlases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.