Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33076915›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2020

Automated identification of the mouse brain's spatial compartments from in situ sequencing data.

Gabriele Partel, Markus M Hilscher, Giorgia Milli, Leslie Solorzano, Anna H Klemm, Mats Nilsson, Carolina Wählby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial Transcriptomics in Human Cardiac Tissue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriele PartelCentre for Image Analysis, Department of Information Technology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4482-3119
Markus M HilscherScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.
Giorgia MilliCentre for Image Analysis, Department of Information Technology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Leslie SolorzanoCentre for Image Analysis, Department of Information Technology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna H KlemmCentre for Image Analysis, Department of Information Technology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mats NilssonScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.
Carolina WählbyCentre for Image Analysis, Department of Information Technology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. carolina.wahlby@it.uu.se.
Uppsala University · SEStockholm University · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 682810Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning BD150008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuroanatomical compartments of the mouse brain are identified and outlined mainly based on manual annotations of samples using features related to tissue and cellular morphology, taking advantage of publicly available reference atlases. However, this task is challenging since sliced tissue sections are rarely perfectly parallel or angled with respect to sections in the reference atlas and organs from different individuals may vary in size and shape and requires manual annotation. With the advent of in situ sequencing technologies and automated approaches, it is now possible to profile the gene expression of targeted genes inside preserved tissue samples and thus spatially map biological processes across anatomical compartments.

resultsHere, we show how in situ sequencing data combined with dimensionality reduction and clustering can be used to identify spatial compartments that correspond to known anatomical compartments of the brain. We also visualize gradients in gene expression and sharp as well as smooth transitions between different compartments. We apply our method on mouse brain sections and show that a fully unsupervised approach can computationally define anatomical compartments, which are highly reproducible across individuals, using as few as 18 gene markers. We also show that morphological variation does not always follow gene expression, and different spatial compartments can be defined by various cell types with common morphological features but distinct gene expression profiles.

conclusionWe show that spatial gene expression data can be used for unsupervised and unbiased annotations of mouse brain spatial compartments based only on molecular markers, without the need of subjective manual annotations based on tissue and cell morphology or matching reference atlases.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsBrainGene Expression ProfilingMaleMiceBrain compartmentsIn situ sequencingSpatial analysis

Identifiers

PMID33076915
PMCPMC7574211
OpenAlexW3093388438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.