Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33076897›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Deciphering disparities in childhood stunting in an underdeveloped state of India: an investigation applying the unconditional quantile regression method.

Saswata Ghosh, Santosh Kumar Sharma, Debarshi Bhattacharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saswata GhoshDemography and Population Health Expert, Centre for Health Policy (CHP), Asian Development Research Institute (ADRI), Patna, 800013, India. ghosh.saswata@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9337-683X
Santosh Kumar SharmaCentre for Health Policy (CHP), Asian Development Research Institute (ADRI), Patna, 800013, India.
Debarshi BhattacharyaLead- State Health Systems, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, India.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-010497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnacceptably high rate of childhood stunting for decades remained a puzzle in the eastern Indian state of Bihar. Despite various programmatic interventions, nearly half of the under-five children (numerically about 10 million) are still stunted in this resource-constrained state. DATA AND

methodsUsing four successive rounds of National Family Health Survey (NFHS) data spread over more than two decades and by employing unconditional quantile regressions and counterfactual decomposition (QR-CD), the present study aims to assess effects of various endowments as well as returns to those endowments in disparities in childhood stunting over the period.

resultsThe results show that although the child's height-for-age Z-scores (HAZ) disparity largely accounted for differing levels of endowments during the earlier decades, in the later periods, inadequate access to the benefits from various development programmes was also found responsible for HAZ disparities. Moreover, effects of endowments and their returns varied across quantiles. We argue that apart from equalizing endowments, ensuring adequate access to different nutrition-centric programmes is essential to lessen the burden of childhood stunting.

conclusionThe state must focus on intersectoral convergence of different schemes in the form of state nutrition mission, and, strengthen nutrition-centric policy processes and their political underpinnings to harness better dividend.

Indexed as

Growth DisordersNutritional StatusChildHumansIndiaRegression AnalysisBiharChildhood stuntingCounterfactual decompositionsIndiaUnconditional quantile regression

Identifiers

PMID33076897
PMCPMC7574201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.