Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33076881›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Acceptability, reach and implementation of a training to enhance teachers' skills in physical activity promotion.

Elina Renko, Keegan Knittle, Minttu Palsola, Taru Lintunen, Nelli Hankonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elina RenkoUniversity of Helsinki, Social Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, P.O. Box Q3 54, Unioninkatu 37, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. elina.renko@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-5639
Keegan KnittleUniversity of Helsinki, Social Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, P.O. Box Q3 54, Unioninkatu 37, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2108-7112
Minttu PalsolaUniversity of Helsinki, Social Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, P.O. Box Q3 54, Unioninkatu 37, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Taru LintunenUniversity of Jyväskylä, Sport and Exercise Psychology, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5191-2251
Nelli HankonenUniversity of Helsinki, Social Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, P.O. Box Q3 54, Unioninkatu 37, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8464-2478

Funding

Academy of Finland 304114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo achieve real-world impacts, behavior change interventions need to be scaled up and broadly implemented. Implementation is challenging however, and the factors influencing successful implementation are not fully understood. This study describes the nationwide implementation of a complex theory-based program targeting physical activity and sedentary behavior in vocational schools (Lets's Move It; LMI). The implementation primarily involved a systematic and theory-based training and user manual for school staff. We explore how the perceived acceptability of this training (in line with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability) relates to (un) successful implementation. The study evaluates (1) the experienced acceptability of the training and anticipated acceptability of later delivering the program; (2) reach and implementation, including adaptations and barriers; (3) whether acceptability ratings predict teachers' intentions for implementation.

methodsUpper secondary school staff from vocational and high schools (n = 194) enrolled in a two-part training, covering implementation of the LMI program and training in motivational interaction styles. One hundred fifty-one participants attended both parts of the training. Participants reported their perceived acceptability of the training and their implementation efforts in online questionnaires at baseline, after training sessions and at long-term follow-up. Qualitative data (open-ended questions) were analysed with content analysis to collate responses. Quantitative data analyses involved correlations and logistic regression.

resultsParticipants rated the training as highly acceptable on all dimensions (average ratings exceeded 4.0 on a 5-point scale). The implementation reached at least 6100 students and 341 school classes. Most teachers intended to continue program implementation. Acceptability ratings explained 51.7% of teachers' intentions to implement the student program (훘

conclusionHigh acceptability and reach of the training indicate strong potential for implementation success. Multiple facets of acceptability seem important to successful implementation. Future research should explore ways to improve acceptability, thereby promoting successful implementation in real-world settings.

Indexed as

ExerciseSchool Health ServicesHumansSchoolsSchool TeachersSedentary BehaviorStudentsAcceptabilityImplementation, teacher trainingSchool-based interventionsTheoretical framework of acceptabilityTheory-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID33076881
PMCPMC7574409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.