Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33076827›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

RepAHR: an improved approach for de novo repeat identification by assembly of the high-frequency reads.

Xingyu Liao, Xin Gao, Xiankai Zhang, Fang-Xiang Wu, Jianxin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Study of Dispersed Repeats in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xingyu LiaoSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 South Lushan Rd, ChangSha, 410083, China. liaoxingyu@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0061-1317
Xin GaoComputational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955, Saudi Arabia.
Xiankai ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 South Lushan Rd, ChangSha, 410083, China.
Fang-Xiang WuBiomedical Engineering and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SKS7N5A9, Canada.
Jianxin WangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 South Lushan Rd, ChangSha, 410083, China.

Funding

111 Project No.B18059Hunan Provincial Science and technology Program No. 2018wk4001National Natural Science Foundation of China No.61732009National Natural Science Foundation of China No.61772557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRepetitive sequences account for a large proportion of eukaryotes genomes. Identification of repetitive sequences plays a significant role in many applications, such as structural variation detection and genome assembly. Many existing de novo repeat identification pipelines or tools make use of assembly of the high-frequency k-mers to obtain repeats. However, a certain degree of sequence coverage is required for assemblers to get the desired assemblies. On the other hand, assemblers cut the reads into shorter k-mers for assembly, which may destroy the structure of the repetitive regions. For the above reasons, it is difficult to obtain complete and accurate repetitive regions in the genome by using existing tools.

resultsIn this study, we present a new method called RepAHR for de novo repeat identification by assembly of the high-frequency reads. Firstly, RepAHR scans next-generation sequencing (NGS) reads to find the high-frequency k-mers. Secondly, RepAHR filters the high-frequency reads from whole NGS reads according to certain rules based on the high-frequency k-mer. Finally, the high-frequency reads are assembled to generate repeats by using SPAdes, which is considered as an outstanding genome assembler with NGS sequences. CONLUSIONS: We test RepAHR on five data sets, and the experimental results show that RepAHR outperforms RepARK and REPdenovo for detecting repeats in terms of N50, reference alignment ratio, coverage ratio of reference, mask ratio of Repbase and some other metrics.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsBase SequenceDatabases, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterGene LibraryGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiceReference StandardsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidReproducibility of ResultsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNAAssemblyDe novo repeat identificationNGS readsThe high-frequency k-mersThe high-frequency reads

Identifiers

PMID33076827
PMCPMC7574428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.