ArticlePolymers2020
Kappa-Carrageenan-Based Dual Crosslinkable Bioink for Extrusion Type Bioprinting.
Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Scaffold-Based and Scaffold-Free Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Highly Extensible Physically Crosslinked Hydrogels for High-Speed 3D Bioprinting.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Sustained dual delivery of metronidazole and viable Lactobacillus crispatus from 3D-printed silicone shells.Biomaterials advances · 2024Article
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting: A Comprehensive Review for Applications in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Piezoelectric Behaviour in Biodegradable Carrageenan and Iron (III) Oxide Based Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Fabrication of k-Carrageenan/Alginate/Carboxymethyl Cellulose basedScaffolds via 3D Printing for Potential Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2024Article
- Recent Developments in Bio-Ink Formulations Using Marine-Derived Biomaterials for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting.Marine drugs · 2024Review
- Review
- Biopolymers for Tissue Engineering: Crosslinking, Printing Techniques, and Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development and Prospective Applications of 3D Membranes as a Sensor for Monitoring and Inducing Tissue Regeneration.Membranes · 2023Review
- Review
- Three-dimensional bioprinting of artificial blood vessel: Process, bioinks, and challenges.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Review
- 1Biomaterial inks for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting: Property, classification, modification, and selection.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Natural Materials for 3D Printing and Their Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A dual-gelling poly(Bioactive materials · 2022Article
- Natural Hydrogel-Based Bio-Inks for 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering: A Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- 3D Bioprinting of Novel κ-Carrageenan Bioinks: An Algae-Derived Polysaccharide.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- 3D Bioprinting of Cell-Laden Hydrogels for Improved Biological Functionality.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2022Review
- Bioink Formulation and Machine Learning-Empowered Bioprinting Optimization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Recent Advances in Chemically-Modified and Hybrid Carrageenan-Based Platforms for Drug Delivery, Wound Healing, and Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioink based 3D bioprinting is a promising new technology that enables fabrication of complex tissue structures with living cells. The printability of the bioink depends on the physical properties such as viscosity. However, the high viscosity bioink puts shear stress on the cells and low viscosity bioink cannot maintain complex tissue structure firmly after the printing. In this work, we applied dual crosslinkable bioink using Kappa-carrageenan (κ-CA) to overcome existing shortcomings. κ-CA has properties such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, shear-thinning and ionic gelation but the difficulty of controlling gelation properties makes it unsuitable for application in 3D bioprinting. This problem was solved by synthesizing methacrylated Kappa-carrageenan (MA-κ-CA), which can be dual crosslinked through ionic and UV (Ultraviolet) crosslinking to form hydrogel using NIH-3T3 cells. Through MA substitutions, the rheological properties of the gel could be controlled to reduce the shear stress. Moreover, bioprinting using the cell-laden MA-κ-CA showed cell compatibility with enhanced shape retention capability. The potential to control the physical properties through dual crosslinking of MA-κ-CA hydrogel is expected to be widely applied in 3D bioprinting applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.