Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33076435›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Usefulness of Modified CEUS LI-RADS for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Sonazoid.

Katsutoshi Sugimoto, Tatsuya Kakegawa, Hiroshi Takahashi, Yusuke Tomita, Masakazu Abe, Yu Yoshimasu, Hirohito Takeuchi, Yoshitaka Kasai, Takao Itoi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Compared with SonoVueQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katsutoshi SugimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Tatsuya KakegawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Hiroshi TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Yusuke TomitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Masakazu AbeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Yu YoshimasuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Hirohito TakeuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Yoshitaka KasaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Takao ItoiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Tokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) was introduced for classifying suspected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it cannot be applied to Sonazoid. We assessed the diagnostic usefulness of a modified CEUS LI-RADS for HCC and non-HCC malignancies based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Patients with chronic liver disease at risk for HCC were evaluated retrospectively. Nodules ≥1 cm with arterial phase hyperenhancement, no early washout (within 60 s), and contrast defects in the Kupffer phase were classified as LR-5. Nodules showing early washout, contrast defects in the Kupffer phase, and/or rim enhancement were classified as LR-M. A total of 104 nodules in 104 patients (median age: 70.0 years; interquartile range: 54.5-78.0 years; 74 men) were evaluated. The 48 (46.2%) LR-5 lesions included 45 HCCs, 2 high-flow hemangiomas, and 1 adrenal rest tumor. The PPV of LR-5 for HCC was 93.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 82.8-98.7%). The 22 (21.2%) LR-M lesions included 16 non-HCC malignancies and 6 HCCs. The PPV of LR-M for non-HCC malignancies, including six intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, was 100% (95% CI: 69.8-100%). In conclusion, in the modified CEUS LI-RADS for Sonazoid, LR-5 and LR-M are good predictors of HCC and non-HCC malignancies, respectively.

Indexed as

CEUScontrast mediahepatocellular carcinomaLI-RADSSonazoidultrasound

Identifiers

PMID33076435
PMCPMC7602639
OpenAlexW3093469642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.