Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33076405›Full record

ArticleVaccines2020

Influenza Vaccination and Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Cohort of Health Workers.

Iván Martínez-Baz, Camino Trobajo-Sanmartín, Irati Arregui, Ana Navascués, Marta Adelantado, Juan Indurain, Ujué Fresán, Carmen Ezpeleta, Jesús Castilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Iván Martínez-BazInstituto de Salud Pública de Navarra-IdiSNA, 31003 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3405-2277
Camino Trobajo-SanmartínClinical Microbiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-IdiSNA, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Irati ArreguiClinical Microbiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-IdiSNA, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Ana NavascuésClinical Microbiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-IdiSNA, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Marta AdelantadoClinical Microbiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-IdiSNA, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Juan IndurainClinical Microbiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-IdiSNA, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Ujué FresánInstituto de Salud Pública de Navarra-IdiSNA, 31003 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8140-4338
Carmen EzpeletaClinical Microbiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-IdiSNA, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Jesús CastillaInstituto de Salud Pública de Navarra-IdiSNA, 31003 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6396-7265

Funding

Horizon 2020 101003673Instituto de Salud Carlos III COV20/00542Instituto de Salud Carlos III INT19/00028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines may induce positive non-specific immune responses to other pathogens. This study aims to evaluate if influenza vaccination in the 2019-2020 season had any effect on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 confirmed infection in a cohort of health workers. During the first SARS-CoV-2 epidemic wave in Spain, between March and May 2020, a cohort of 11,201 health workers was highly tested by RT-qPCR and/or rapid antibody test when the infection was suspected. Later in June, 8665 of them were tested for total antibodies in serum. A total of 890 (7.9%) health workers were laboratory-confirmed for SARS-CoV-2 infection by any type of test, while no case of influenza was detected. The adjusted odds ratio between 2019-2020 influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 confirmed infection was the same (1.07; 95% CI, 0.92-1.24) in both comparisons of positive testers with all others (cohort design) and with negative testers (test-negative design). Among symptomatic patients tested by RT-qPCR, the comparison of positive cases and negative controls showed an adjusted odds ratio of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.68-1.08). These results suggest that influenza vaccination does not significantly modify the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The development of specific vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 is urgent.

Indexed as

COVID-19health workersinfluenza vaccinationpandemicSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33076405
PMCPMC7712321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.