Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33076324›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Fate of Residual Pesticides in Fruit and Vegetable Waste (FVW) Processing.

Tri Thanh Nguyen, Carmen Rosello, Richard Bélanger, Cristina Ratti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Investigating the effect of dichlorvos and acetamiprid residues in greenhouse cucumber on biochemical parameters and protective role of colostrum.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tri Thanh NguyenSoils and Agri-Food Engineering Dept, Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Carmen RoselloChemical Engineering Group, Chemistry Department, Universitat des Iles Balears, Palma, 07122 Mallorca, Spain.
Richard BélangerPlant Science Dept, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Cristina RattiSoils and Agri-Food Engineering Dept, Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERC RGPIN - 2017- 04774 - operating grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants need to be protected against pests and diseases, so as to assure an adequate production, and therefore to contribute to food security. However, some of the used pesticides are harmful compounds, and thus the right balance between the need to increase food production with the need to ensure the safety of people, food and the environment must be struck. In particular, when dealing with fruit and vegetable wastes, their content in agrochemicals should be monitored, especially in peel and skins, and eventually minimized before or during further processing to separate or concentrate bioactive compounds from it. The general objective of this review is to investigate initial levels of pesticide residues and their potential reduction through further processing for some of the most contaminated fruit and vegetable wastes. Focus will be placed on extraction and drying processes being amid the main processing steps used in the recuperation of bioactive compounds from fruit and vegetable wastes.

Indexed as

dryingextractionfruit wastesintensification technologiespesticidevegetable wastes

Identifiers

PMID33076324
PMCPMC7602544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.