ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Management of Young Athletes with Asymptomatic Preexcitation-A Review of the Literature.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Different patterns of pre-excitation in a large Italian cohort of asymptomatic non-competitive athletes evaluated by telecardiology screening: Prevalence and ECG features.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- Can We Provide Safe Training and Competition for All Athletes? From Mobile Heart Monitoring to Side Effects of Performance-Enhancing Drugs and MicroRNA Research.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe management of young athletes with asymptomatic preexcitation remains a challenge, regardless of the progress we have made in understanding the basis of condition and developing catheter ablation procedures. The risk of sudden death, however small, yet definite, being the first symptom is determining our approach. The aim of the study was to establish the current state of knowledge regarding the management of young athletes diagnosed with asymptomatic preexcitation, by conducting a literature review. MATERIAL AND
methodsA comprehensive literature review was completed in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was limited to English language publications using the following search terms: "asymptomatic" or "incidental" and "pre-excitation" or "Wolff-Parkinson-White" or "delta wave" and "athlete" or "sport". The search was supplemented by hand review of the bibliographies of previous relevant systematic reviews.
resultsThe search resulted in 85 of abstracts, and the manual search of the bibliographies resulted in 24 additional papers. After careful analysis 10 publications were included in the review. In all but one of the presented papers, the authors used non-invasive methods and then either trans-esophageal or invasive EPS as a way to risk stratify asymptomatic patients. Evidence of rapid conduction through the accessory pathway was considered high risk and prompted sport disqualification. In the analysed reports there were combined: 142 episodes of the life-threatening events (LTE)/sudden death (SCD), of which 56 were reported to occur at rest, 61 during activity and no data were available for 25.
conclusionsathletic activity may impose an increased risk of life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with asymptomatic preexcitation; hence, a separate approach could be considered, especially in patients willing to engage in high-intensity, endurance and competitive sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.