ArticleCarcinogenesis2021
HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas from patients with two tumors display synchrony of viral genomes yet discordant mutational profiles and signatures.
Article in Carcinogenesis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Double trouble: Synchronous and metachronous primaries confound ctHPVDNA monitoring.Head & neck · 2023Observational
- Single-cell transcriptomic profiling for inferring tumor origin and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance.NPJ precision oncology · 2022Article
- Genetic variation within the human papillomavirus type 16 genome is associated with oropharyngeal cancer prognosis.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2022Article
- APOBEC Mutagenesis Is Concordant between Tumor and Viral Genomes in HPV-Positive Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Viruses · 2021Article
- Prospective assessment of multiple HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.Oral oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC) is increasing in prevalence in the USA, as are cases of patients with multiple HPV + OPSCCs (mHPV + OPSCC). mHPV + OPSCCs present a unique opportunity to examine HPV + OPSCC mutation acquisition and evolution. We performed sequencing of the viral genome, somatic exome and somatic transcriptome from 8 patients each with 2 spatially distinct HPV + OPSCCs, and 37 'traditional' HPV + OPSCCs to first address if paired tumors are caused by the same viral isolate and next, if acquired alterations, and the underlying processes driving mutagenesis, are shared within pairs. All tumor pairs contained viral genomes from the same HPV type 16 sublineage and differed by 0-2 clonal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), suggesting infection with the same viral isolate. Despite this, there was significant discordance in expression profiles, mutational burden and mutational profiles between tumors in a pair, with only two pairs sharing any overlapping mutations (3/3343 variants). Within tumor pairs there was a striking discrepancy of mutational signatures, exemplified by no paired tumors sharing high APOBEC mutational burden. Here, leveraging mHPV + OPSCCs as a model system to study mutation acquisition in virally mediated tumors, in which the germline, environmental exposures, immune surveillance and tissue/organ type were internally controlled, we demonstrate that despite infection by the same viral isolate, paired mHPV + OPSCCs develop drastically different somatic alterations and even more strikingly, appear to be driven by disparate underlying mutational processes. Thus, despite a common starting point, HPV + OPSCCs evolve through variable mutational processes with resultant stochastic mutational profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.