ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2020
The YOUth study: Rationale, design, and study procedures.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI-based assessment of fetal brain gyrification: Reliability across two methods.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Considerations for conducting developmental neuroimaging research on mental health topics.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Development of attentional disengagement in typically developing children and children with elevated levels of attentional deficits.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Fetal MRI study of brain differences in early-onset fetal growth restriction versus healthy controls at 30 weeks of gestation.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025Article
- Infant EEG microstate dynamics relate to fine-grained patterns of infant attention during naturalistic play with caregivers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Age- and sex-related differences in social competence and emotion labeling in pre-adolescence.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Automated Segmentation of Fetal Intracranial Volume in Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Using Deep Learning: Identifying Sex Differences in Prenatal Brain Development.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Microstate Analysis of Continuous Infant EEG: Tutorial and Reliability.Brain topography · 2024Article
- Maximizing the potential of EEG as a developmental neuroscience tool.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2023Article
- Key considerations for child and adolescent MRI data collection.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2022Article
- Adverse childhood experiences and fronto-subcortical structures in the developing brain.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Automatic measurements of fetal intracranial volume from 3D ultrasound scans.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2022Article
- Neuroimaging brain growth charts: A road to mental health.Psychoradiology · 2021Article
- Chinese Color Nest Project : An accelerated longitudinal brain-mind cohort.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2021Review
- De-identification procedures for magnetic resonance images and the impact on structural brain measures at different ages.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Teaming up to understand individual development.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
- Relations between Child and Parent Fears and Changes in Family Functioning Related to COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- FAIR, safe and high-quality data: The data infrastructure and accessibility of the YOUth cohort study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2020Article
- The YOUth cohort study: MRI protocol and test-retest reliability in adults.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2020Article
- The building blocks of social competence: Contributions of the Consortium of Individual Development.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behavioral development in children shows large inter-individual variation, and is driven by the interplay between biological, psychological, and environmental processes. However, there is still little insight into how these processes interact. The YOUth cohort specifically focuses on two core characteristics of behavioral development: social competence and self-regulation. Social competence refers to the ability to engage in meaningful interactions with others, whereas self-regulation is the ability to control one's emotions, behavior, and impulses, to balance between reactivity and control of the reaction, and to adjust to the prevailing environment. YOUth is an accelerated population-based longitudinal cohort study with repeated measurements, centering on two groups: YOUth Baby & Child and YOUth Child & Adolescent. YOUth Baby & Child aims to include 3,000 pregnant women, their partners and children, wheras YOUth Child & Adolescent aims to include 2,000 children aged between 8 and 10 years old and their parents. All participants will be followed for at least 6 years, and potentially longer. In this paper we describe in detail the design of this study, the population included, the determinants, intermediate neurocognitive measures and outcomes included in the study. Furthermore, we describe in detail the procedures of inclusion, informed consent, and study participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.