Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33075675›Full record

ArticleComputerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society2020

The optimisation of deep neural networks for segmenting multiple knee joint tissues from MRIs.

Dimitri A Kessler, James W MacKay, Victoria A Crowe, Frances M D Henson, Martin J Graves, Fiona J Gilbert, Joshua D Kaggie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Unified Focal loss: Generalising Dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentation.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Emergence of Deep Learning in Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dimitri A KesslerDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Electronic address: dak50@cam.ac.uk.
James W MacKayDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Victoria A CroweCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Frances M D HensonDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Martin J GravesCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Fiona J GilbertDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Joshua D KaggieDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jk636@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated semantic segmentation of multiple knee joint tissues is desirable to allow faster and more reliable analysis of large datasets and to enable further downstream processing e.g. automated diagnosis. In this work, we evaluate the use of conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (cGANs) as a robust and potentially improved method for semantic segmentation compared to other extensively used convolutional neural network, such as the U-Net. As cGANs have not yet been widely explored for semantic medical image segmentation, we analysed the effect of training with different objective functions and discriminator receptive field sizes on the segmentation performance of the cGAN. Additionally, we evaluated the possibility of using transfer learning to improve the segmentation accuracy. The networks were trained on i) the SKI10 dataset which comes from the MICCAI grand challenge "Segmentation of Knee Images 2010″, ii) the OAI ZIB dataset containing femoral and tibial bone and cartilage segmentations of the Osteoarthritis Initiative cohort and iii) a small locally acquired dataset (Advanced MRI of Osteoarthritis (AMROA) study) consisting of 3D fat-saturated spoiled gradient recalled-echo knee MRIs with manual segmentations of the femoral, tibial and patellar bone and cartilage, as well as the cruciate ligaments and selected peri-articular muscles. The Sørensen-Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), volumetric overlap error (VOE) and average surface distance (ASD) were calculated for segmentation performance evaluation. DSC ≥ 0.95 were achieved for all segmented bone structures, DSC ≥ 0.83 for cartilage and muscle tissues and DSC of ≈0.66 were achieved for cruciate ligament segmentations with both cGAN and U-Net on the in-house AMROA dataset. Reducing the receptive field size of the cGAN discriminator network improved the networks segmentation performance and resulted in segmentation accuracies equivalent to those of the U-Net. Pretraining not only increased segmentation accuracy of a few knee joint tissues of the fine-tuned dataset, but also increased the network's capacity to preserve segmentation capabilities for the pretrained dataset. cGAN machine learning can generate automated semantic maps of multiple tissues within the knee joint which could increase the accuracy and efficiency for evaluating joint health.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerBone and BonesHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingConvolutional neural network (CNN)Generative adversarial network (GAN)Image segmentationMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Musculoskeletal

Identifiers

PMID33075675
PMCPMC7721597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.