Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33075103›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Serospatial epidemiology of zoonotic Coxiella burnetii in a cross section of cattle and small ruminants in northern Nigeria.

Nusirat Elelu, Adefolake Ayinke Bankole, Ramat Jummai Musa, Ismail Ayoade Odetokun, Musa Rabiu, Khalid Talha Biobaku, Abdulfatai Aremu, Akeem Olayiwola Ahmed, Mohammed Ibraheem Ghali, Mashood Abiola Raji and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic review ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Distribution and Prevalence ofInfectious disease reports · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nusirat EleluFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-1255-4572
Adefolake Ayinke BankoleSchool of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Ramat Jummai MusaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Ismail Ayoade OdetokunFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-5171-1895
Musa RabiuFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Khalid Talha BiobakuFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Abdulfatai AremuFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Akeem Olayiwola AhmedFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Mohammed Ibraheem GhaliFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Mashood Abiola RajiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Ndudim Isaac OgoNational Veterinary Research Institute, Vom, Nigeria.
Sally Jane CutlerSchool of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3429-0651
Gabriel Adetunji Taiwo OgundipeFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistent and highly transmissible Coxiella burnetii is a neglected infection that negatively affects reproductive parameters of livestock. It is also of zoonotic importance and has been reported to cause devastating human infections globally. Domestic ruminants represent the most frequent source of human infection. Data from Nigeria are very few and outdated. There is a significant gap in up-to-date information on the exposure, spatial distribution and risk factors of infection of this important disease. The exposure to C. burnetii was determined using sensitive serological assays in cattle and small ruminants. A total of 538 animals made up of 268 cattle and 270 small ruminants were sampled from three northern Nigerian states. The proportion of cattle sampled that were seropositive from the study locations were: Kwara 14/90 (15.6%; 95% CI: 8.8-24.7); Plateau 10/106 (9.43%; 95% CI: 4.6-16.7) and Borno 4/72 (5.56%; 95% CI: 1.5-13.6) states. Lower seroprevalence was recorded among the small ruminants sampled, with positives recorded from sheep and goat sampled from only Kwara state 6/184 (3.3%; 95% CI: 1.2-7.0); while none of the small ruminants sampled from Plateau were seropositive. The results of the bivariate analysis showed that none of the tested independent variables (village, age group, sex, breed of cattle, presence of ticks, reproductive status, and management system) were statistically significant factors associated with seropositivity of cattle for antibodies to C. burnetii. Stakeholders involved in animal husbandry should be duly educated on proper disposal of birth products as well as bodily fluids in order to reduce environmental contamination, persistence and human infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCoxiella burnetiiCross-Sectional StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGoatsMaleQ FeverRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSerologic TestsSheep

Identifiers

PMID33075103
PMCPMC7571698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.